
Institutional Diversity: Excellence in Action
1992
Copyright, August 1992 by the Board of Trustees, Michigan State University
Copies available from the Office of the Provost, the Office of the Vice President for Finance and Operations, and the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
This report was produced under the direction of the Office of the Provost by University Publications, Division of University Relations, Michigan State University. Editing and production supervision: Kristan A. Tetens. Graphic design and art direction: Cynthia Lounsbery. Photography: Kim Kauffman Photography, Inc.
MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity institution.
The Background: A Changing America
The Past Decade
Contexts for Change: Intensifying Efforts to Meet Increasing Needs
Building on a Long Tradition
Recognizing Windows of Opportunity
Developing Solutions: Achieving Excellence Through Diversity
Developing Solutions: Creating Excellence Through Diversity Within Community
Making Commitments: The MSU IDEA
The MSU IDEA as a Collection of Ideas
Beyond Compliance: Personal Commitment to Community
The MSU IDEA and Other Planning Platforms
Avoiding the "Trance of Non-Renewal"
Leadership and Administration
1. Demonstrated Leadership for Increased Efforts to Advance Diversity Within Community
2. Statewide Citizens' Advisory Group to the University
3. All-University Excellence in Diversity Conference
4. Excellence in Diversity Awards and Grants
5. Sexual Orientation Task Force
6. Leadership Positions for Diversity Within Community
7. Administrative Internships and Fellowships
8. Council for Multicultural Community
9. The College-Level Planning Program and the Support Unit Planning Program
10. Administrative and Performance Review and Reward Systems
11. Handicappers and Veterans
12. Restructuring of the Department of Human Relations
Recruitment and Retention
Faculty
13. Enhancement of Current Efforts
14. Competitive Retention of Underrepresented Group Faculty
15. Peer Review and Reward System
16. Improved Exit Interviews
17. Collaborative Opportunities for Visiting Faculty
Undergraduate Students
18. New Goals to Increase the Presence of Minorities Among Undergraduate Students
19. Increasing Persistence Through the Academic Progression: K-12 to the University
20. Expanded Academic Support Programs
21. Quality of Campus Life
22. Financial Support and Employment Programs
Graduate and Graduate/Professional Students
23. Increasing Graduate and Graduate/Professional Diversity: The Next Step
24. Special Recruitment Programs
25. Retention Programs
26. Graduate Assistantships
Support Staff
27. Unit Responsibility for Hiring and Promotion of Underrepresented Group Staff
28. Hiring Assistance to Units: Continuous Recruitment and Agency Referral Programs
29. Staff Development
30. Handicapper Recruitment and Retention Across Vice-Presidental Areas
Instruction (Curriculum), Research, and Outreach
31. Diversity and Multicultural Awareness Across the Curriculum
32. Multidisciplinary Instruction, Research, and Outreach
33. Support for Women's Studies, Ethnic Studies, and Gay and Lesbian Studies Courses
34. Improving Instruction for a Multicultural Academic Community
35. Outreach Programs
36. Professional Preparation of Student Affairs Staffs
37. Student Leadership Development Courses
38. Contributions of Diverse and Multicultural Groups in MSU's History
39. Bringing Faculty from Historically Black Colleges and Universities to MSU
Climate
40. Safety and Security for Students, Faculty, and Staff
41. Discrimination and Harassment
42. Biased Language
43. Orientation and Development Programs for Faculty, Students, and Staff
44. Programs, Conferences, Art Collections, Exhibits, and Performances
45. Family-Supportive Arrangements
46. Underrepresented Group Presence on Governance and Other Committees
47. Media and Issues of Diversity
48. Faculty and Staff Surveys to Describe Climate of Opinion on Diversity Issues
49. Program Accessibility and Enabling Technology
50. Toward a New Community
Table 1
Composition of the Labor Force in 1985 and Projected Composition Increases from 1985 to 2000
Table 2
Population Diversity: U.S., Michigan, and Michigan State University
Table 3
Minority Enrollments at MSU, Fall Terms 1981-91
Table 4
Persistence/Attrition Data for 1991 - First-Time Freshmen, All Ethnic Groups
Table 5
Academic Workforce, 1988-91
Table 6
MSU Graduate Admissions of Minority Students, 1981-91
MSU IDEA II is a plan for advancing excellence through diversity within the Michigan State University community. It represents a cooperative effort among administrative units and constituent groups to build an exemplary multicultural environment within which demographic and cultural diversity are present, diversity is valued, and cross-cultural understanding is promoted. Such a transformed community supports all members in reaching their full potential.
Like the first draft of the MSU IDEA which was initiated by the Office of the Provost in 1989, MSU IDEA II calls not only for traditional responses to individual and constituent group needs, but significant institutional restructuring and redirection within a context of fiscal constraints. President John A. DiBiaggio has stated that the MSU IDEA is not a bureaucratic design, not a list of political promises, not a retrospective report, but a "forward looking," "urgently needed" plan of action.
Central to the plan is increasing the presence of underrepresented groups within the faculty, administration, staff, and student populations. Increased presence itself, however, does not ensure greater understanding and appreciation for difference. The plan calls for a range of efforts to capture the value of diversity and to translate that value into interactive pluralism and expanded opportunities for learning.
While continuing a focus on underrepresented groups for which the University has federally mandated responsibilities (i.e. Blacks, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Americans, Native Americans, women, handicappers, and Vietnam-era veterans), MSU IDEA II also directs attention to the value of diversity as reflected in individual differences based on religion, ethnicity, national origin, and sexual orientation.
As MSU continues to advance multicultural excellence through diversity, it also seeks to develop a renewed sense of community--a community that Ernest Boyer asserts must be purposeful, open, just, disciplined, caring, and celebrative. This search is not new to the land-grant tradition of Michigan State University, which has long championed education that serves the needs of people and acts as a catalyst for social change. However, it takes on additional importance as a charge to the University as it educates for life in the twenty-first century.
The University itself must be a truly multicultural community if it is to maintain excellence and provide leadership to the larger state, national, and international communities that it serves. In a multicultural community, diversity is woven into the entire fabric of daily activity. It takes an important place in the University's value and reward system and demonstrates the University's social, economic, and moral reason for being. Diversity and excellence within community must become so institutionalized that a comprehensive plan, such as the MSU IDEA II will no longer be necessary.
MSU IDEA II contains 50 initiatives in the areas of leadership and administration; recruitment and retention of faculty, students, and staff; instruction, research, and outreach; and climate. Highlights of the fifty initiatives are presented below:
Minorities on Campus, the American Council on Education's handbook for enhancing diversity in colleges and universities, warns that because discussions of diversity are "emotionally charged and value-laden," documents such as the MSU IDEA II are susceptible to misunderstanding if uses of language are not clarified by way of introduction. (Green, p. xvi)
The Association of Handicappers in Higher Education "Yes! Ability" campaign points out the necessity of using civil not medical terms in the context of civil rights. The MSU IDEA II focuses on competence not condition and uses the term "handicapper" (competent regardless of handicap) in preference to "handicapped" (limited) or disabled (incompetent, legally disqualified) in order to affirm that the plan deals with the many who can do and not with the few who can not.
MSU IDEA II borrows language from federal documents when referring to federally protected groups. Labels such as "minorities," "protected group members," and "underrepresented groups," can be problematic because they tend to aggregate diverse groups and individuals under collective headings that can lead to stereotyping and confusion. Although it might be desirable to avoid such terms all together or to disaggregate groups with every reference, this is often not feasible. We have frequently made language choices in the interest of readability, so that the important message and spirit of this document could reach a broad audience. A glossary of terms is appended to this document in an attempt to clarify terminology applied within MSU IDEA II.
While consideration has been given to using language carefully throughout MSU IDEA II, we acknowledge the difficulty of the task. With the authors of Minorities on Campus, we "hope that readers will keep their sights on the challenge and the solutions rather than on the vehicle of expression. Language has its limitations, human potential has few." (p. xvii)
"...Colleges and universities must become true communities of learners in which the most sacrosanct assumptions of cultural arrogance must be examined and a new basis of learning established--one that includes the whole human family."
"I'd like to see the extent of racial and gender diversity become a measure of greatness among our universities. Diversity enriches the learning environment... The point is all of us in the various disciplines need to listen and learn from new voices. There is a dialogue that is legitimate, important to scholarship, and that connects to better education."
As one of this country's premier land-grant/AAU institutions, Michigan State University has a heritage of providing quality education in a context of commitment to social equity. Now a changing America demands that we achieve a higher level of effort to secure excellence by advancing diversity and community. To meet this challenge today and for the future, Michigan State University presents its comprehensive diversity plan -- MSU IDEA II (Institutional Diversity: Excellence in Action). This more inclusive and comprehensive transformational plan is a revision of the MSU IDEA, first published on April 4, 1989.
At Michigan State University, the achievement of excellence is multidimensional. Diversity and pluralism in the student body, in the faculty and staff, in the curriculum, and in the climate of the University are integrally associated with this goal. It requires specific actions as well as continuing and informed dialogue among different cultures and differing points of view. Maintaining preeminence in the creation, transmission, application, and preservation of knowledge necessitates a diversity of perspectives and background experiences. Preparing students to solve the difficult problems of a postindustrial, pluralistic world calls not only for sound disciplinary and multidisciplinary study, but for constructive peer-to-peer and faculty-student experiences that will expand and deepen perspectives, awaken or reinforce ethical sensibilities, and heighten understanding and respect for cultural and ethnic differences.
With the inauguration of MSU IDEA II, Michigan State University gives voice to the promise of an academic community for the future. In such a transformed community, diversity is woven into the entire fabric of the University's daily life; it takes an important place in the institution's value and reward system because it is necessary for the University's continuing excellence and integral to the its social, economic, and moral reason for being. Progress toward such a re-vision of community at MSU requires a commitment that goes beyond achieving compliance. It means increasing the presence of underrepresented group members significantly. It calls upon all members of the community to create an hospitable climate where diversity and difference are celebrated, where civility based on mutual respect is natural, and where cultural variety flourishes and vitalizes productive intellectual and social interaction. Such a multicultural environment benefits not only those who have traditionally been underrepresented and disadvantaged, but all who work and study at this institution. It discourages fragmentation and unproductive particularization, while encouraging that difference be valued. It supports all members of the community in reaching their full potential. It provides leadership for the larger community that the University serves.
Recent reports catalog a series of challenges that face "a changing America." The United States is moving from an industrial society to one based in information and technology. An internationalized marketplace provides new contexts for this nation's economic and political leadership. Our need is for more and better-prepared skilled workers who are trained to cooperate and to excel in a multicultural global economy.
Shifting demographic patterns are a crucial issue in responding to these developments. Between now and the year 2000, minorities and women will make up approximately 85 percent of net additions to the nation's work force, and the number of handicappers in the workplace will increase. The anticipated increase in minorities and women by the year 2000 is reflected in the following projections for the national work force.
By the year 2000 one out of every three people living in the United States will be nonwhite and one-third of all school children will be minorities. In 1987, 24 percent of Michigan school children were minorities, and these percentages are growing yearly. Michigan's economic prosperity depends upon the success of these expanding minority populations in education and in the job market (Hodgkinson, p. 2). The state's social vitality and the integrity of its educational system depend on the many benefits that a successful multicultural community affords.
Higher education's approach and level of effort must improve significantly to more adequately recruit, retain, and encourage underrepresented groups who will play an increasingly important role in our economy and society during the next century. National indicators have suggested that education's progress toward diversity "lost momentum" during the 1980's in several critical areas. Recently, universities and colleges have renewed commitments and made efforts to evaluate past experiences and to advance diversity with renewed energy. Such initiatives must continue and increase in intensity and effectiveness if we are to prepare for the conditions that lie ahead.
As reported in the Fall 1987/Winter 1988 issue of Educational Record,
The lack of [educational] progress is reflected at every . . . stage of the pipeline. Attrition is a major problem on many campuses, so fewer minorities are receiving undergraduate degrees. An inhospitable environment . . . deters minorities from pursuing graduate degrees. The insufficient pool of doctorates combined with a lack of commitment to affirmative action has produced the most minimal representation of minorities in the faculties and administrations of predominantly white institutions (p 9).
In considering the recruitment of underrepresented minority students into higher education, it is important to note trends in the high school graduation rates for these groups. While high school completion rates for traditional-age Blacks (18-24) has increased nationally from 68 percent in 1976 to 75 percent in 1988, it still is considerably lower than the 82 percent rate for white students. For Hispanic youth, the high school completion rate, while fluctuating somewhat over the past several years, has shown no appreciable gain and remains extremely low at 55 percent.
Of further concern is the significant decline since the mid-1970s in the percentage of Black and Hispanic high school graduates who are enrolling in college. For Black students, the decline has been from 33 percent in 1976 to 28 percent in 1988. The percentage of Hispanic graduates enrolling declined from 36 percent to 31 percent during this same period (ACE Research Briefs, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1990). Recent reports of 1989 enrollments show some gain in the percentage of Black high school graduates enrolling (31.8 percent), but a further decline (28.7 percent) is noted for Hispanic high school graduates. (The Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac, August 1991). These low rates of enrollment are of particular concern given the improved levels of academic preparation being reported for Black, Hispanic, and Native American high school students (ACE Research Briefs, Vol. 1, No 3, 1990).
Although overall minority student enrollment nationally has increased in actual numbers and percentage of total enrollment, these overall increases must not mask the disproportionately low enrollment of Blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans in undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
While MSU had its largest percentage enrollment of minority students fall term 1991, it is imperative that enrollment of the underrepresented minorities keep pace with their growing representation within the state and nation. Table 2 shows the relation of population diversity within the U.S., Michigan, and the University. Particular attention must be directed toward increasing the numbers of Black and Hispanic first-time freshmen. Further, with an increasing concentration of Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans in two-year colleges (ACE Research Briefs, Vol. 2, No 3. 1991), greater attention must be directed toward providing these students an opportunity to continue their education and to attain bachelor's degrees. Table 3 depicts the number of students from minority groups enrolled at MSU from 1981 to 1991.
The retention of historically underrepresented minority groups also requires greater attention. Their persistence at MSU and nationally falls short of the rate for all students. Nationally, Blacks and Hispanics are less likely to persist and earn a bachelor's degree (ACE Research Briefs, Vol. 2, No 3. 1991). At MSU, while overall retention rates may be higher than many institutions, the retention rates for Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans fall behind that for all students. New strategies must be pursued to help ensure greater opportunity for success for all students admitted. Strategies to strengthen academic support programs and to improve the quality of campus life must both be employed to achieve this end. Table 4 summarizes persistence and attrition rates for first-time freshmen of all ethnic groups in 1991.
Within the past decade other shifts in student enrollments have been noted. The enrollment of women nationally has increased from 51 percent in 1980 to 54 percent in 1988, and there has been a moderate increase (2.5 to 2.8 percent) in the enrollment of international students. At Michigan State University, however, the percentage of women enrolled fall term 1991, 51 percent, was below the national average, while the percentage of international students, 5.6 percent, was considerably above.
Data from the National Center of Health Statistics suggests that less than 5 percent of all handicapper 18- to 22-year-olds in Michigan are attending public colleges or universities in the state. This percentage contrasts with approximately 30 percent for all residents aged 18-22. Although higher education institutions report increases in handicapper enrollment (National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Forum), Michigan State University and other higher education institutions must continue to pursue ways to make access and opportunity for this underrepresented group if their full potential is to be realized.
Michigan State has shown slow but steady improvement in recruitment rates for minority and women faculty within the tenure system over the last decade, with the percentage of tenure system protected class employment rising from 20.4 in 1980 to 29.3 in 1991; however, the University has been less successful in retaining minority and women faculty during that same time period. Minorities and women are underrepresented among the tenure-stream faculty relative to availability in a number of disciplines, and the progress of minorities and women into senior faculty ranks and into administrative leadership positions is slow.
Table 5 summarizes the composition of the academic workforce between 1988 and 1991.
The University has begun to show progress in reversing the significant decline in graduate minority student enrollment over the last ten years; however, despite recent increases, minority and women graduate students are not well-represented in several key areas. Table 6 charts minority graduate student applications, admissions, and enrollments between 1981 and 1991.
Representation of women and minorities in the support staff has increased significantly over the past decade, so that most support job groups have representation comparable to that available in the workforce. However, maintaining this record and correcting the remaining areas of support staff underutilization will be difficult and will require creative approaches due to increasing fiscal constraints, contractual seniority provisions, and limited opportunity and availability in specialized areas. Additional attention must be paid to the minority turnover rates for support staff, which tend to exceed those of non- minority staff.
The decade of lost momentum and insufficient magnitude in recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups in the faculty and student body as well as a lack of progress in staff areas where underutilization still exists could have a significant impact on this nation's future. In One Third of a Nation, the American Council on Education/Education Commission of the States recalls that it has been twenty years since the Kerner Commission emphasized how inconsistent such a trend is with our national ideals and "how much it threatens our democratic system that succeeds only as it provides its citizens with opportunities to share in national life and prosperity" (pp. 17-18).
Our political health depends upon a discerning electorate and our economic health requires a skilled and educated labor pool. Our social health requires that all citizens have opportunity for full participation. Powerlessness is contagious and threatens our national integrity and our humanity. Racism, sexism, bias against handicappers, heterosexism, antisemitism or similar denigration based on religion, and other forms of discrimination that prevent people from realizing their human rights and their full potential must be eliminated. We cannot afford to have a permanent underclass comprised primarily of underrepresented group members and confined by poor education to low-paying jobs or long-term unemployment. We must not deny the opportunity for advancement and an improved quality of life to any of our citizens.
President DiBiaggio, in writing for the Summer/Fall 1989 issue of the Educational Record, has broadly affirmed his commitment to diversity in the context of quality of life issues. He noted that, "until we optionally and practically value diversity (not merely appreciate it) on our campus, we preclude full attainment of the quality of life our students, faculty and staff deserve." The University has the opportunity and responsibility to teach by what it models--to promote within the larger society an improved quality of life for all peoples.
Michigan State University has a history of commitment to the elimination of inequality. In 1935 the governing Board of Michigan State College endorsed a strong policy of nondiscrimination based on race or color. This vision was broadened in 1955 to ban discrimination on the basis of sex, religion, or national origin. The University adopted an affirmative-action program in 1970, adding handicappers and veterans in 1974. In a recent action, the Board renewed its dedication to this historical affirmation. The board monitors that program through annual reports.
The University's affirmative action activities for students over three decades confirm the commitment. Michigan State was a leader in support for economically/educationally disadvantaged students through pioneering efforts such as "Project Ethyl" (1963), which became the Detroit Project and eventually the College Achievement Admissions Program (CAAP) in 1983. Since the early 1970s, MSU has also provided access and support for underrepresented groups of students through OSS (the Office of Supportive Services), EOP (the Office of Equal Opportunity Programs), MECCA (the Multi-Ethnic Counseling Center Alliance), and MAP (the Minority Aide Program). Michigan State was among the first schools to create an Office of Programs for Handicapper Students (in 1971), the first to hire a handicapper director, and a leader in responding to handicapper needs for increased access to academic programs. In 1988 Michigan State became the headquarters for the Michigan Consortium for Enabling Technology.
During the past two decades a number of major affirmative action initiatives have also been implemented for support staff. Support staff vacancies were publicly posted beginning in 1972. Affirmative action "bypass" provisions were negotiated in collective bargaining agreements in 1974 (Clerical Technical Union) and 1982 (Locals 1585 and 999). These provisions have been very helpful in the achievement of formal affirmative action goals, first developed for support staff in 1978. Guidelines for filling support staff vacancies were developed in 1979 through the Twelve-Step Support Staff Hiring Procedure. A network of affirmative-action referral agencies was developed in the 1970s and 1980s. Through regular dialogue and strengthened procedures, this network has become an important link for recruitment, hiring, and retaining protected class applicants. Through a combination of these efforts, departments have made substantial progress in meeting affirmative-action goals, both in terms of hiring and promoting staff to ensure distribution through all grade levels.
In the late 1970s, the Office of the Provost developed clear affirmative action guidelines to monitor searches for protected faculty group members through the Fourteen-Step Planning and Hiring Procedure. Since 1976 the Mildred B. Erickson Fellowship Fund has provided help primarily for women students re-entering MSU, and in the same year the Board of Trustees created the MSU Affirmative Action Graduate Financial Assistantship Program for minorities and women entering underrepresented fields. In the early 1980s, the Women's Advisory Committee to the Provost and the Women's Advisory Committee to the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services were instrumental in the development of an institutional policy on sexual harassment which served as a model for many other institutions. Also established in the 1980s were special programs on sexual assault and safety education within the Division of Student Affairs and Services. Today, through the Martin Luther King, Jr.-Cesar Chavez-Rosa Parks Initiative and through a variety of other strategies, the University continues to foster demographic diversity and intercultural education.
In recent years, through academic governance within colleges, departments and schools, the academic affairs area has also been planning for significant curriculum changes to improve intercultural education and support other diversity-related goals. In 1988 The Council to Review Undergraduate Education (CRUE) recommended that the undergraduate curriculum should include increased opportunities for students to study national diversity and international and multicultural experience. That recommendation will be implemented within the Integrative Studies Program in keeping with the Integrative Studies Policy, approved by the Academic Council in January 1991, and as the University curriculum is revised and updated through the conversion to a semester calendar. Within the revised curriculum, all students will be required to take courses dealing with national diversity and international or multicultural experience.
Although Michigan State has actively encouraged equity on its campus for many years, President John DiBiaggio has recognized that our programs have not always produced sufficient results. In his 1988 State of the University address, Dr. DiBiaggio focused the University's attention on the future and on the need for a new level of effort. He noted that,
As never before, in part because of salutary societal changes, we have the opportunity to demonstrate in very real ways and in very long-lasting ways a land-grant commitment that, because of both attitudes and demographics, was unable to be attained earlier. In the MSU . . . of the twenty-first century we need to see the embodiment of our heritage . . . That task starts today. And our results must match our rhetoric.
President DiBiaggio reinforced the need for additional efforts on behalf of diversity in his April 1989 memorandum to the University community on equal opportunity, nondiscrimination and affirmative action in which he stated that "we must come to understand that diversity and quality are not adversaries, but allies." He noted that the extent to which we advance equality in the next few years
will be a primary measure of our excellence as a university, as a state, and as a nation. We must open our professional circles and our classrooms to new dialogue and to a diversity of perspectives. If we are to educate our students for a multicultural world, we must provide a pluralistic community . . . There is diversity in our excellence. And there is excellence in our diversity. The reconfiguration of Michigan State University must reflect participation of all groups, including those clearly underrepresented.
Nationally, approximately 500,000 faculty - almost as many as we have today - will be required to fill vacancies in the next 20 years. Although changing economic conditions will certainly not permit MSU to replace all of its retiring faculty, retirements from the University will provide possibilities for diversifying our faculty during the next 15 years. In addition, other separations will add to this number of employment opportunities. In an increasingly competitive market, however, it is unlikely that our present hiring and retention patterns for women, handicappers, and minorities can effectively respond to this opportunity. Based on present hiring rates as well as currently projected opportunities for hiring, even assuming continuation of present availability levels, it would take some academic departments and schools several decades to achieve representation equal to present availability for women and for minorities. During this period, fiscal pressures are likely to increase and positions that are filled will frequently have to serve multiple University goals. In this context, special diligence and attention to hiring underrepresented groups members will be required.
Despite an otherwise low turnover rate, it is also projected that there will be nearly 1,000 retirements of support staff in the next fifteen years. Although hiring for staff positions will also be curtailed, retirements will offer some hiring opportunities at all support staff levels, at a time when women and minorities make up an increasing share of the available national and state workforce.
In the face of such projections, it becomes clear that the University must develop more innovative means for addressing retirement opportunities, and take advantage of the overall increase in availability while at the same time seeking additional funding for difficult-to-fill underrepresented group positions. MSU must devise new strategies for recruitment and retention if it is to keep pace in a competitive market for underrepresented faculty and staff.
MSU must also develop creative measures for cultivating students throughout the educational network--as early as K-12, but also in community colleges. In addition, the University must improve support systems and provide encouragement to undergraduates so they will realize their potential and move on to graduate school and to academic and professional careers in greater numbers.
It is critical that as we seek to educate a diverse student population, we demonstrate our commitment to the retention of the students we enroll. We must recognize that the experiences and perceptions of current students in many dimensions define the University for those who follow and thus have significant influence on recruitment efforts. We now have the opportunity to demonstrate our resolve to increase the satisfaction and success of underrepresented groups through basic changes in organizational culture and to promote a quality of campus life that reflects respect for the worth and dignity of each individual. To do less will discourage higher education study for many we seek to educate.
Increasingly it is recognized that cultural differences among people contribute to the learning environment and to the creation of new knowledge. The traditional "melting pot" or assimilationist approach often meant the assimilation of minorities into a dominant culture that denied them the opportunity to maintain and express their cultural heritage. It often means that women are measured by male values and models, particularly when entering nontraditional fields. This approach has placed limited value on some contributions of both women and minorities. It has also restricted learning opportunities within higher education. The new, transformed community will value differences and the diverse contributions of its members.
Coupled with increased respect, appreciation, and celebration of differences must come renewed attention to those common interests and shared values that provide the infrastructure of community. Greater emphasis on cross-cultural communication is needed as we seek to expand opportunities for interaction among individuals and groups of different backgrounds and to develop a stronger sense of community within the University.
Institutions of higher education have a unique opportunity and responsibility in our increasingly pluralistic society to model and teach both the values of diversity and community, to demonstrate that diversity and community are no less alien concepts than diversity and excellence. Ernest Boyer, in the forward to Campus Life, In Search of Community, states the challenge succinctly ". . . .I'm convinced that the challenge of building community reaches far beyond the campus, as well. Higher education has an important obligation not only to celebrate diversity, but also to define larger, more inspired goals, and in so doing serve as a model for the nation and the world" (p. xiii).
This special report of the Carnegie Foundation provides six principles that can assist in defining the type of community we strive to be and which can serve as guidelines in the daily decision-making that shapes the nature of the institution. These principles specifically address diversity within the community. These principles clearly echo principles that have governed internal institutional advancement at MSU through the R3 (refocusing, rebalancing, and refining) planning process for several years and will continue to shape the University for the future.
A hallmark of the academy is open inquiry and freedom of expression. The MSU IDEA II attempts to avoid the polarization engendered by oversimplified debates about "political correctness." It recognizes that institutional choices have always had political implications. Rather than seeing multiculturalism as a threat to open expression, it emphasizes that cross-cultural education, as it is understood at MSU, is designed to stimulate knowledgeable open debate and dialogue which are the hallmarks of academic freedom and academic excellence. It encourages the incorporation of the significant dialogues about diversity and multiculturalism - with their philosophical, political, and demographical components - into classes and co-curricular activities.
The communication of ideas, and the critical analysis and testing of those ideas are as central to the purpose of the University and the quality of the teaching-learning process as they are central to promoting diversity within community. In the discussion of an open community, special attention is directed toward the need for civility as well as clarity of expression if a climate of reasoned discourse is to be supported. According to the Boyer's report, "...Incivility is a problem, and all too frequently words are used not as the key to understanding but as weapons of assault." A just community requires that diversity be aggressively pursued; a disciplined community calls for a clear definition of responsibility to others and reinforces the values of honesty and integrity as fundamental to the educational enterprise.
President DiBiaggio, when talking about developing community, has given special attention to the importance of making Michigan State University a more caring community. A modern university must demonstrate that it is a humane enterprise which acknowledges the need for interaction, support and encouragement among peoples. Such an emphasis does not deny the importance of individual independence and autonomy in academic endeavors; rather, it contributes to a quality of campus life that can support individual achievement.
The university as a celebrative community acknowledges both tradition and change. Much can be learned from the traditions and celebrations of constituent groups. Sharing rituals and traditions of the university serves to connect both individuals and constituent groups.
To build community while promoting diversity and excellence continues to be a challenge of enormous proportion in an institution of the size and complexity of Michigan State University. Yet as a social institution, we must continue to examine our organizational structure, policies and practices to ensure that there are no institutional barriers that arbitrarily divide those who choose to work and study here.
The institution itself must seek to become a truly multicultural organization with a demonstrated commitment to excellence and diversity within community. Racism, sexism, bias against handicappers, heterosexism, antisemitism or similar devaluation based on religion or ethnicity are antithetical to both individual and community development. As the University pursues a greater sense of community, it will continue to champion open inquiry and freedom of expression, encourage the communication of ideas and invite and promote the critical analysis and testing of those ideas. Failure to do otherwise would deny our responsibility as an educational institution committed to being a progressive social force in shaping the future. Promoting excellence, valuing diversity and building community must be pursued in concert as the institutional agenda to educate for life in the twenty-first century.
In response to the challenges and opportunities presented by the quest for excellence through diversity within community, the MSU IDEA provides for the increased presence of minorities, women, and handicappers in the faculty, staff, student body, and administration. It addresses critical retention issues in relation to the quality of campus environment. Persistence through academic progression from K-12 to graduate school is also a key element. The MSU IDEA attempts to prevent both overt inequities and more subtle manifestations of inequality within the University. It endeavors to ensure that instruction (including curriculum), research and outreach, governance, and other academic community activities, contribute to a climate that is hospitable to diverse groups, to open dialogue, and to new knowledge.
To meet the needs of Michigan and the nation in the twenty-first century, the MSU IDEA offers 50 University-level initiatives and augmentations to continuing programs. It also engages all academic units in a reassessment of goals and other activities through a College-Level Planning Program and support units in a Support Unit Planning Program. Administrators, faculty, staff and students throughout Michigan State University will be held responsible not only for greater efforts on behalf of diversity and excellence, but also for results.
The MSU IDEA is drawn from many people's ideas for action. It is a distillation of suggestions that have come across administrative lines and from a number of constituent groups. The Women's Advisory Committee to the Provost, the Women's Advisory Committee to the Vice-President for Finance and Operations, the Women Students' Advisory Council, the Black Faculty and Administrators' Association, student governing groups, the Hispanic Institute Task Force, the Hispanic/Native American Faculty Staff Association, the Minority Advisory Council to the President, Gay and Lesbian Faculty and Staff Association, the Alliance of Gay/Bi/Lesbian Students, the Women's Studies Program, the Urban Affairs Program, the Graduate School, the Council to Review Undergraduate Education, the Asian-Pacific American Faculty and Staff Association, the Council of Deans, the President's Handicappers' Advisory Committee, the Supportive Services Advisory Committee, and several other concerned groups as well as many individuals have contributed directly or indirectly to the MSU IDEA.
That so many have taken a hand in developing this plan for institutional excellence through diversity and community is encouraging. However, their contributions are just a beginning in what should be a major collegial effort in the 1990s and beyond. Our hope is that every faculty member, student, staff member, and administrator at Michigan State University will demonstrate personal and collective commitment to the principles and implementation of the MSU IDEA so that the plan will succeed.
Crucial to the success of this effort must be the awareness that all of us in the University community are responsible for embodying and communicating the University's values. The quality of life not only for underrepresented groups, but for everybody on this campus will be determined not only by increasing numbers and demographic diversity or by adherence to the letter of the law. It will also be determined by our genuine concern for others--by the intellectual generosity, civility, and hospitality we extend to others, by the ethics we impart through our actions as well as our words, and by the spirit behind the institutional structures and procedures we create and support. Administrative leadership, curriculum, pedagogy, co- curricular activities and numerous other factors contribute to the degree of community or alienation that all people who work or study here experience.
Progress in achieving diversity within community comes slowly and painfully because it requires changes in well-established attitudes and habits. In these matters we must be better than our predecessors and former selves. We should be vigilant lest our daily working relationships, our professional hierarchies, our curricula, and our pedagogics become confining rather than empowering. We should be wary lest our views of excellence exclude the benefits of diversity from the definition and our review and evaluation processes become signs of the narcissism or self-centeredness of our times, perpetuating ourselves and our perspectives to the exclusion of constructive variety.
We must commit ourselves to building new bonds among a world of talented peers. We must commit ourselves to creating a successful multicultural community that encourages all who work and study at MSU to reach their full potential. We must work to open our networks, promotional channels, and assignments to create an empowering environment through mentoring and sponsoring as well as other programs and special efforts. Our continued excellence and our intellectual integrity depend on our emphasizing development as well as selection, cooperation and collegiality as well as competition and prestige.
In "Multiculturalism: The Crucial Philosophical and Organizational Issues," Patrick Hill, provost and professor of philosophy at Evergreen State University, has commented on the nature of the changes that are currently occurring within higher education and within contemporary experience more generally.
It is easy to read contemporary experience in the light of simpler times, of a more familiar order, and to regard the explosion of diversity as productive of fragmentation, incoherence, and conflict . . . I . . . prefer the metaphor inchoateness to the backward-looking metaphor of fragmentation. We are not staring wistfully at the fragmented ruins of a temple once whole, but poring over the recently discovered jottings of a novel whose form or plot has yet to emerge . . . If higher education were to take as its role the creation of new structures of dialogue and invention and cooperative discovery (i.e., structures appropriate to an inchoate world), there may indeed emerge a new world order . . . a new world order that empowers hitherto excluded peoples of our nation and of the world to contribute their expertise on an equal footing to our collective understanding of ourselves, society, and the world (p. 47).
Although the challenges for change are numerous and complex, colleges and universities across the nation have begun to respond to these as opportunities. Like its peer institutions, Michigan State University is reviewing its values, its curriculum and its climate. The MSU IDEA is only one of many new programs comprising Michigan State 2000 and is integrally connected to other University platforms for improvement, including the Council to Review Undergraduate Education (CRUE), the Council on the Review of Research and Graduate Education (CORRAGE), Planning for a Lifelong University System (PLUS), Administrative Management and Program Support (AMPS), Managing for Excellence and Employee Excellence Programs (EEP), and SETT 92 (the conversion to a semester calendar). The MSU IDEA is one in a series of related efforts that emphasize harmonious interaction of diverse groups on this campus. All these platforms move MSU toward being a university that is multidimensionally excellent; multidisciplinary and built on excellent departments and schools; integrated; humanitarian and caring; strongly coupled, both externally and internally; pluralistic and diverse; built on current and selectively developed strengths; state-of-the-art in its use of new technology in the learning environment; and more efficient and effective. These R3 principles stand in opposition to the isolation, fragmentation, territorial or disciplinary competition and distrust, that undermine cooperative collegial effort, inhibit effective use of limited resources during times of fiscal constraints, and threaten the future of this University and higher education more generally.
The interrelationship of curriculum, of disciplines, and academic support groups - and the productive interactive involvement of ethnically and racially diverse groups, traditional and nontraditional students, handicappers, women, and gay men and lesbians throughout the mainstream of University life - are allied goals. They combine in our comprehensive program to become a more caring community, one that rededicates itself to the common good within and beyond academe. Like other university platforms for change, the MSU IDEA is a living, evolving plan. Its aim is to enhance Michigan State's leadership in advancing diversity and multidimensional excellence, expanding educational opportunities, and preparing our students to be enlightened citizens in the pluralistic and globally interdependent world of tomorrow.
John Gardner tells us that colleges have a tendency to sink under a spell of self-approval and self-preservation that resists acknowledging flaws and misses opportunities to create beneficial change. Gardner observes that a primary strategy for breaking the "trance of non-renewal" is to encourage diversity in the system. (Gardner, p, 24)
Annual progress reports on the April 1989 draft of the MSU IDEA as well as a history of working programs, demonstrate that MSU's commitment is more than rhetoric. However, although we have a worthy record on which to build, we cannot afford to be complacent. Advancing Diversity within the conception of a new multicultural community is essential as we meet the future. Much remains to be done to create the diverse and hospitable MSU we envision. If MSU is to become a better university, it must accept the challenge to change, to be excellent in both traditional and new ways; it must find creative energy to maintain diversity as a necessary high priority and to reach goals, especially during times of limited economic resources. The MSU IDEA represents this institution's acceptance of that challenge--a challenge that requires increased sensitivity to the relationship among the concepts of excellence, diversity and community from everyone at Michigan State University. In an essay on "Quality and Diversity" from his Tomas Rivera Lecture, Arturo Madrid provides a thoughtful view of central issues in the MSU IDEA.
The Vision of Michigan State University for the Year 2000
MSU IDEA II calls for improved strategies and objectives to advance collaborative efforts on behalf of diversity and excellence within community at Michigan State University in the 1990s and beyond. Concerted action across this institution is necessary to increase the presence of underrepresented groups in the faculty and academic staff, student body, support staff, and administration. Instruction (including curriculum), research, and outreach as well as a hospitable campus climate, must also contribute to furthering the University's commitment to diversity and excellence within community. The following new initiatives as well as augmentations to continuing initiatives and programs address these issues.
1 The Board of Trustees, the President and administration of Michigan State University recommit themselves to providing strong, visible leadership to enhance diversity within community.
a. University leaders have emphasized and will increasingly emphasize publicly and repeatedly, the University's condemnation of overt and subtle forms of racism; sexism; denigration of the worth of handicappers; heterosexism; and intolerance based on religion, ethnicity, age, or physical characteristics. University leaders will visibly demonstrate their ongoing commitments to diversity and community in local, state, and national public appearances; public statements; news releases; fund raising; budgeting; monitoring of affirmative-action efforts and support for hiring and programs.
b. The President and the administration will provide visible support to the new Office for Affirmative Action Compliance and Monitoring and to those specifically charged with advancing diversity and cross-cultural understanding in the vice-presidential areas. See Initiative 12.
c. The University has presented its recommendations for changes in procedures and policies related to eradicating discriminatory behavior during the 1991-92 academic year. Recommended procedures for taking effective action in cases where the human rights and dignity of others are violated are being forwarded through established administrative and governance channels.
d. The leadership of the University at all levels will encourage open and educative, scholarly discourse about issues associated with the MSU IDEA and its concepts.
2 A diversely constituted statewide Citizens' Advisory Group has been established as part of MSU IDEA I. It provides an opportunity for leaders from business, industry, education, and the broader community to join with University representatives to address issues relating to underrepresentation of minority groups, handicappers, and women. The Citizens' Advisory Group will also undertake projects that advance broad cross-cultural understanding at MSU. Continued effort will be made to strengthen this important partnership with leaders across the state.
3 The University will continue to hold an annual All-University Excellence In Diversity Conference.
a. Major keynote addresses will highlight the need for a continuing commitment to diversity, community, and excellence.
b. A variety of other campus events, including workshops, seminars, performances, exhibits, and roundtable discussions will be part of the conference.
c. Excellence in Diversity awards and grants will be presented in an appropriate ceremony during the conference (see Initiative 4).
d. Evaluation of the University's progress on excellence in diversity and program planning will be part of the conference.
e. The event should be evaluated within five years of the first annual conference.
4 Michigan State University will continue to publicly recognize achievements in advancing excellence through diversity and cross-cultural understanding by presenting the series of diversity awards and grants established in MSU IDEA I.
a. Michigan State will present a series of Excellence in Diversity awards for units, groups and/or faculty, students, and support staff who have made exceptional contributions to affirmative-action efforts and to increasing multicultural understanding at this University. Awards to individuals will carry public and monetary recognition.
b. Michigan State will present the Excellence in Diversity grants program to provide funding for research projects and/or curriculum or program development which are likely to contribute to affirmative action and cross-cultural understanding at MSU.
c. The awards and grants program will be evaluated within five years of the inauguration of the project.
5 The University will receive recommendations from a University-wide Task Force on Lesbian and Gay Issues that was established to study and make a report on gay, lesbian and bisexual concerns.
a. With the approval of the President, the Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs, Finance and Operations, and Student Affairs and Services have cooperated in bringing to MSU consultants to advise the University on effective procedures for creating the task force and processing its recommendations.
b. After review of consultants' recommendations, the administration, in consultation with the Gay and Lesbian Faculty and Staff Association and with gay/bi/lesbian student groups, has established an all-University task force to explore issues and develop recommendations.
c. The University-wide task force on Lesbian and Gay Issues will review University and unit level policies, procedures and practices and make recommendations to the vice presidents that are designed to ensure the protection of the rights of gay men and lesbians and to support their retention.
6 Leadership positions for racial, ethnic, and multicultural issues will continue to be established in the areas of academic affairs, finance and operations, and student affairs and services.
Assistant Provost for Student Academic Support Services and Racial, Ethnic, and Multicultural Issues.
a. A Senior Advisor for Racial, Ethnic and Multicultural Issues who reports directly to the Provost was established under MSU IDEA I. As part of a reorganization of the Office of the Provost, the former Senior Advisor will take on additional duties related to support and retention of students and will become the Assistant Provost for Student Academic Support Services and Racial, Ethnic and Multicultural Issues.
The new Assistant Provost will be a key advisor to the Provost for racial, ethnic, and multicultural issues in meetings of the Office of the Provost and other functions of the Provost's staff. The new Assistant Provost attends the Council of Deans meetings and meetings of other University-level groups relevant to his/her position.
The new Assistant Provost identifies issues of racial, ethnic, and multicultural concern; develops strategies that can be implemented within existing administrative lines, and assists in assuring accountability for support and retention efforts and results. The Assistant Provost is active in exploring, evaluating, and implementing institutional, self-study, and societal research relevant to diversity, cross-cultural understanding, and excellence.
The Office of the Provost has consulted with representatives of groups specifically involved with racial, ethnic, gender, sexual and multicultural concerns about the appointment. The person in this position addresses generic issues and also brings sensitivity and special expertise from particular cultural backgrounds in order to 1) increase communication between the Office of the Provost and minority and other ethnic groups 2) advance cross-cultural understanding, and 3) develop and maintain support and retention services.
Special Assistant for Multicultural Development
b. To more effectively assist students in their own development and to maintain an environment supportive of diversity within community, the Special Assistant will 1) provide greater opportunity for students to interact with others unlike themselves, 2) encourage students to focus on shared values, 3) assist students to understand and value differences, 4) help students to challenge stereotypes, 5) confront prejudice and discriminatory behaviors among students, and 6) prepare students for leadership roles in a pluralistic society. This position will report to the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services.
Multicultural Development Coordinator
c. This assistant will be appointed to provide broad support for MSU IDEA initiatives, including 1) coordinating the unit-level planning process, 2) providing/coordinating programming and training on racial, ethnic, and multicultural issues, 3) providing support on career counseling and leadership development, 4) coordinating the administrative internship/mentoring program, and 5) providing support to selection committees and special recruitment efforts for support staff. This position will report to the Vice President for Finance and Operations through the Assistant Vice President for Human Resources.
Director of the Women's Resource Center
d. Over 51 percent of MSU students, 66.9 percent of University support staff, and 32.7 percent of faculty and academic staff are women as of fall term 1991. With this increasing population comes a need for programs, resources and other assistance pertaining to women's safety and security, sexual harassment, and other issues. Providing special attention to women's issues will be the primary responsibility of leadership in the Women's Resource Center, which will replace the current Division of Women's Programs (see initiative 12c) and consolidate several other existing projects. This responsibility will include addressing women's rights and needs through dialogues with the vice presidents and providing information and referrals to women on matters such as sexual harassment, women's safety and security, women's roles in managing work and family, and career development. It will involve coordinating and facilitating programs throughout the University on issues relating to the quality of life for women faculty, students, and staff.
Appointments of Women, Minorities, and Handicappers to Leadership Positions
e. The President and the vice presidents will actively increase efforts to recruit and retain women, minorities, and handicappers for high-level leadership positions (vice presidents, deans, chairs, directors, and executive management) throughout the University.
7 The University will sustain and augment development programs that encourage the advancement of underrepresented group members into higher education leadership positions.
a. The Office of the Provost will continue to support and will augment the CIC Administrative Leadership Program as described in MSU IDEA I. The purpose of the program is to "identify women and minority faculty with exceptional ability and promise who may wish to consider senior administrative leadership positions."
MSU initiated the CIC Program with the other Big Ten Universities and the University of Chicago. Four fellows are selected from each institution to attend seminars on academic administration and participate in on-campus learning and enrichment programs throughout the year. The Office of the Provost will support increasing participation and evolving off-campus and on-campus programming associated within this initiative.
b. The Vice President for Finance and Operations will establish an administrative internship/mentoring program. The purpose of the program is to identify women and minority staff with exceptional ability and promise who are interested in career advancement and to provide them with exposure to underrepresented areas and levels of the University.
c. The University will continue to nominate candidates for administrative fellowships as part of the yearly American Council on Education's Center for Leadership Development programs. Underrepresented group faculty members will continue to be actively encouraged to become candidates for these fellowships.
8 A Council for Multicultural Community will be established at the University level to advance cross-cultural communication, interaction, and learning opportunities among constituent groups, to serve as advocate to the President and vice presidents with regard to diversity-related issues, and to explore further the development of a multicultural "Center for a New Community" (see Initiative 50).
a. The group will provide a focus and forum for discussion and debate of cross-cultural issues relating to handicappers; racial, ethnic or religious groups; women; and gays, bisexuals, and lesbians.
b. Membership will be drawn from currently established and/or affiliated racial, ethnic, and religious groups; women's groups; handicapper groups; and gay, bisexual or lesbian groups, as well as nonminority representatives from the University community with expertise and/or interest in multicultural cooperation. It should include faculty, staff, students, and administrators. The chairperson will be selected by the council from its membership.
c. The group will report to the President in the consultative mode through the vice presidents, and will meet with several or a single vice president as appropriate, given the issues under exploration.
d. The President and the vice presidents will continue to meet with established University affiliated minority, women's, handicapper, gay, and lesbians groups in accordance with past patterns of practice and scheduling opportunities.
9 To ensure ownership for renewed affirmative-action efforts at all levels of the University, the Provost and the Vice President for Finance and Operations have established or will establish unit-level planning programs, one for the academic affairs area (the College-Level Planning Program) and one for University support units (the Support Unit Planning Program). The College Level Planning Program is being implemented in accordance with MSU IDEA I guidelines. These programs require units to advance diversity, pluralism, and excellence by undertaking profile reviews in order to identify strengths and weaknesses and to set goals, strategies and timetables for unit-specific initiatives.
College-Level Planning Program
a. Colleges will continue to engage in a three- to six-year strategic planning and review process begun under MSU IDEA I to advance diversity and pluralism efforts (see THE MSU IDEA College-Level Planning Packet distributed September 1989 as well as update memorandum from Provost to Deans and separately reporting directors, November 1990 and November 1991). As part of continuing and augmented efforts under this program, academic support units such as Undergraduate University Division, the Honors College, the Office of Admissions and Scholarships, and the Office of the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology will be requested to develop formal plans.
The College-Level Planning Program will continue to be monitored by deans and by the Office of the Provost as part of the Academic Program Planning and Review (APP&R) process. Consideration of affirmative-action efforts and utilization status will be part of this review as well as in monitoring associated with the annual affirmative-action report to Board of Trustees. The annual affirmative-action report is the responsibility of the Office of Affirmative-Action Compliance and Monitoring.
Support Unit Planning Program
b. To ensure achievement of affirmative action goals and a multicultural community, support units will participate in a unit-level planning process. This process will include 1) an assessment of units' current affirmative action efforts and utilization status, 2) development of unit-level strategies and objectives to achieve diversity and a multicultural environment which supports all staff in reaching their full potential, and 3) an annual update of plans and review by the Vice President for Finance and Operations of progress in meeting support unit planning objectives.
10 The Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs, Finance and Operations, and Student Affairs and Services will give increased attention to holding administrators who report to them accountable for commitment to the University's intensified efforts to advance diversity and pluralism.
a. Annual administrative performance reviews will give significant consideration to progress made in furthering the University's commitment to diversity, excellence, and community, especially as shown in college-level plans and support unit plans.
b. Administrators will be held responsible for increasing attention in hiring to candidates' commitment to, and competency in, the area of multicultural environments
c. Administrators will be held responsible for seeing that efforts to advance the University's commitment to diversity within community are recognized in college, department, school, unit reward systems (e.g., reappointment, tenure, promotion, merit pay decisions, and in nominations for college and university distinguished service awards). Care should be taken to ensure that the reward system does not "devalue" nontraditional contributions made by some participants. Rewards are to be based on criteria established to evaluate meritorious performance.
d. Administrative accountability will be ensured through adjustments of financial support for units and merit pay for responsible administrative leaders.
11 The University will increase efforts to make the environment more conducive to handicapper and veteran involvement in university life.
a. The Assistant Provost and Assistant Vice President for Academic Human Resources and the Assistant Vice President for Human Resources will work with a subcommittee of the President's Handicapper Advisory Committee to study issues related to the employment of handicappers throughout the work force and to make recommendations based on their findings. Areas for study include data collection needs, rates of hire, evaluation instruments and procedures, promotion and benefits. See President's Handicapper Advisory Committee Recommendation 8; also see MSU IDEA II Initiatives 30, 34 e-h, and 49.
b. The Assistant Provost and Assistant Vice President for Academic Resources and the Assistant Vice President for Human Resources will facilitate gathering information about Vietnam-era veterans and identifying and addressing their concerns.
12The Department of Human Relations will be restructured, in accordance with Initiative 13 of MSU IDEA I, in order to 1) increase effectiveness in affirmative-action compliance and monitoring, 2) increase visible high-level leadership for diversity and pluralism, 3) strengthen the role and responsibility of the vice presidents in facilitating programs for diversity and cross-cultural understanding specific to the vice-presidential areas, and 4) increase cooperation among vice-presidential areas in advancing diversity and pluralism initiatives in order to make the most effective use of creative planning and funding opportunities.
a. The University will establish the Office for Affirmative-Action Compliance and Monitoring under the leadership of an Advisor to the President and Executive Director. The Office will focus increased efforts on monitoring and compliance and will increase interaction with academic and support units to provide additional attention to affirmative-action efforts.
b. The University will establish leadership positions in three vice-presidential areas for diversity and pluralism advocacy and programs to increase awareness of, and sensitivity to, issues related to advancing diversity within community and implementing other MSU IDEA initiatives.
c. The University will establish a Women's Resource Center to bring together and coordinate resources, advocacy for women's issues, and women's programs for faculty, staff and students. The Women's Resource Center will consolidate several existing initiatives, replace the current Division of Women's Programs and use current resources as appropriate.
13 The Office of the Provost will continue to advance the recruitment of Black/African-Americans, American Indians, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, women, and handicappers through the series of initiatives described in MSU IDEA I.
Enhanced Faculty Recruitment Incentive Program
a. An Enhanced Faculty Recruitment Incentive Program with funding and provisions as these are available will continue to provide opportunities for continuous recruitment of underrepresented group members through a partnership between the colleges and the Office of the Provost.
The MSU Handbook for Searches with Special Attention to Affirmative Action and Diversity
b. All academic search and selection committees in the University will continue to use the new MSU Handbook for Searches with Special Attention to Affirmative Action and Diversity. Updated and augmented additions to the Handbook will be produced periodically.
Developing Underrepresented Group MSU Graduates for MSU Faculty Positions
c. The colleges, with the continued support of the Office of the Provost, will continue to hire from among their most promising underrepresented group graduate students to fill entry-level faculty positions at Michigan State, particularly in areas where national availability for potential underrepresented group candidates is severely limited.
Support for Resource Database Development for Professionals in Underrepresented Groups
d. The University will continue to participate in consortia (such as the recently formed Consortium to Support Development of Hispanic Professionals described below) and to employ other means to develop in an ongoing and systematic way, resource data bases to assist in the recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups and to provide assistance to underrepresented communities, to universities, and to other agencies and organizations.
14 MSU will continue to take a strong institutional position on competitive retention of faculty members from underrepresented groups in order to maintain their presence on campus.
a. Colleges may, on a partnership basis, seek funding when necessary and appropriate for proposals to improve retention of underrepresented group faculty members. Faculty mentoring and sponsorship initiatives, research leaves and facilitation, well-developed tenure system appointment extension programs, and other creative means to ensure retention will be encouraged.
b. The colleges, in partnership with the Office of the Provost, will continue intensified efforts to retain current underrepresented group faculty in the face of external recruiting efforts by peer institutions. Deans, chairpersons, and directors should be alert to external recruiting efforts and should draw the attention of the Provost to cases where the Office of the Provost might intervene.
c. The Office of the Provost will actively encourage the nomination of outstanding senior underrepresented group faculty for University Distinguished Professorships and other special honors so that senior underrepresented group faculty receive visible recognition for their excellence. Just as in recruitment, care should be taken to ensure that complete dossiers are presented, and that they are scrutinized fairly so that people with both traditional and nontraditional evidences of excellent records are given opportunities for these awards.
15 The Office of the Provost will continue to emphasize through public statements, information dissemination, and administrative and faculty workshops the means for achieving equitable peer reviews and rewards (e.g., equitable application of University guidelines for reappointment, promotion, and tenure; recognition of multidimensional excellence, including contributions to advancing hospitable multicultural educational environment; teaching excellence; nontraditional scholarship; and outreach activities).
16 The Offices of the Assistant Provost and Assistant Vice President for Academic Human Resources, with the Assistant Vice President for Human Resources, will improve and expand exit interviews to determine why people leave MSU. This information will be used to improve retention. Exit interview data will become part of the Academic Program Planning and Review discussions between deans and the Office of the Provost to improve retention efforts in academic units. The offices of the assistant vice presidents should involve the Office of Affirmative-Action Compliance and Monitoring in the improvement of exit interviews.
17 The Office of the Provost, in collaboration with the Graduate School and the colleges, will continue its commitment to visiting faculty programs as ways of creating and maintaining a more diverse group of faculty at MSU. The University will explore additional means for bringing underrepresented group faculty to campus with the goal of providing role models for students and of developing faculty and student recruitment and retention networks. Special attempts will be made to take advantage of faculty sabbatical leaves and summer availability and to match these with research opportunities.
18 The University will continue its MSU IDEA I campaign to increase the presence of underrepresented minorities in the MSU undergraduate student population in an effort to reach the following all-University goals.
a. The representation of minority undergraduate student population, disaggregated by groups, should be equal to or exceed the representation of college-bound Michigan high school graduating seniors in those groups at the end of the first three-year planning period.
b. Beyond that period the University, in partnership with the K-12 system and other agencies, will aim for representation that mirrors the population of the state. The University will aim for representation of minorities across the institution at all undergraduate levels. The intention is to focus not only on increased recruitment of minority students but also ensuring that their academic progress is similar to the rate of nonminority students.
c. The Office of the Provost will review and adjust these goals periodically.
19 The University will increase efforts to improve the persistence of minorities through the academic progression--from elementary schools into high schools, from high schools into the University, and from community colleges into the University. Special attention will be directed to increasing the participation of underrepresented minority males in all recruitment and retention programs.
The Detroit Compact Incentive Scholars Program
a. The University will continue its commitment to the Detroit Compact Incentive Scholars Program. In cooperation with the statewide Presidents' Council, The Detroit Compact will continue to identify students to whom Michigan State University will agree to provide the equivalent of full-tuition scholarships on a renewable basis.
Adopt-A-School Program
b. The Undergraduate University Division will continue to sponsor the King-Chavez-Parks College Day Program. This program is designed to increase college involvement in helping high schools improve the preparation of the students they graduate. The program involves direct intervention with selected high schools or middle schools around the state. Students from the schools visit Michigan State University during the year, sponsored by the MSU college that has adopted that school. Students are encouraged to continue to take college preparatory work at the high school, to ensure that they will be college-bound upon completion of high school. The Office of Minority Student Affairs will continue to work collaboratively with the King/Chavez/Parks Program on the Adopt-A-School Program.
Youth at Risk Proposals
c. The Office of the Provost, through the Vice Provost for University Outreach and in cooperation with the Kellogg Foundation, will focus on Youth-at-Risk as a major theme. In advancing social, economic, and educational opportunities for underrepresented groups, the University, through partnerships with the colleges and appropriate support units, will seek to increase its involvement in such projects as the Upward Bound CHOICE Program, the Black Child and Family Institute, 4-H Youth Programs, The Michigan Compact, and other youth-at-risk related activities.
d. The Office of the Provost, through the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology, will continue to develop and enhance telecourses and other programs using academic technology, such as "Tune in Math and Science" to serve school districts in inner cities or other areas where there are a large number of students at risk.
e. The Office of the Provost, through the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology, will continue its support for youth-at-risk initiatives through technological assistance and training of families to families associated with the Black Child and Family Institute.
Key Community Development Program
f. The Office of Minority Student Affairs in conjunction with other recruiting efforts will develop further linkages in key communities across the state to discuss 1) what MSU can do to recruit minority students, 2) what MSU can do to retain more minority students once enrolled, and 3) what schools can do to better prepare students for MSU entry.
Transfer Programs - Community College Outreach
g. The Office of the Provost, through the Assistant Provost for Student Academic Support Services and Racial, Ethnic, and Multicultural Issues and the Assistant Provost for Undergraduate Education and Academic Services, will seek to increase the number of minority students who transfer from community colleges to continue their educations at Michigan State.
Increased Support and Participation in the CIC "Advancing Diversity in Higher Education" Program
h. The University will continue to increase support for and participation in "Advancing Diversity in Higher Education," an expanded set of Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) programs designed "to improve minority access to the University, to recruit qualified minority students as early as possible, and to retain minority students by providing mentoring, peer networking, and financial aid." The expanded CIC programming includes initiatives for the elementary and secondary school levels, for undergraduate education, for graduate education, for professional careers, and for leadership positions.
Retention Task Forces
i. The Office of the Provost and the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services will focus attention on coordinated efforts to improve retention through a series of task forces to work on immediate and long term retention issues.
20 The University will continue to enhance academic support and retention programs.
Bridge and Enrichment Programs
A. The Assistant Provost for Academic Student Support Services and Racial, Ethnic, and Multicultural Affairs will undertake a careful review of Summer enrollment programs such as SUPER and all other bridge and enrichment programs designed to increase retention so that subsequent investments of scarce resources can be focused on those programs that have potential for being most effective in advancing retention goals.
Increased Programs in Academic Units
b. The Assistant Provost for Student Academic Support Services and Racial, Ethnic, and Multicultural Issues and the director of the Undergraduate Division will augment continuing collaborative efforts with academic units to increase retention of Black/African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian, and Hispanic students. Such college-based programs for minority students as those within the Colleges of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Minority Apprenticeship Program), Arts and Letters (DIAL -- Diversity in Arts and Letters Program), Business, Communication Arts and Sciences, Engineering, Natural Science, Human Health Programs, and Veterinary Medicine are positive examples. The Office of Minority Student Affairs in the Division of Student Affairs and Services will further efforts to support and cooperate in carrying out such programs.
Workshops for Excellence
c. Workshops for Excellence specifically designed to expand career options and to challenge minority students to excel will be expanded by Student Affairs and Services.
21 Renewed attention will be given to factors within the environment that contribute to, or detract from, the quality of life for students from diverse groups. Because a student's sense of belonging, or "fit" with the University is often a primary factor in retention, additional efforts will be made to ensure an environment that promotes respect for the worth and dignity of each individual, that provides opportunity for the development of self identity, that offers access to opportunity, and provides support and encouragement to be involved, to persist and to succeed. See the section on "Climate" in this report, for additional initiatives addressing quality of life issues.
22 The University will emphasize the need for increased financial support and employment programs for underrepresented group students.
Support for No-Need Students
a. Institutional grant aid will be used to award no-need based scholarships to academically outstanding students; underrepresented minority group students will be encouraged especially to apply.
"Packaging" Financial Aid
b. University guidelines for "packaging" of aid will continue to be reviewed to ensure access and continuing opportunity for underrepresented groups. Specific attention will be given to the combination of grants, scholarships, loans, and work in financial aid awards.
Employment Opportunities for Underrepresented Group Students
c. Additional attention will be given to student employment opportunities for handicapper and minority students to provide both financial support and experience for furthering career objectives. Student employment should increasingly represent the changing nature of the workforce.
d. The Office of the Office of the Provost will encourage colleges and departments to hire promising undergraduate members of underrepresented groups as undergraduate assistants for professors teaching large section classes.
Scholarship and Loan Programs Databank
e. A databank will be developed by the Office of Minority Affairs in conjunction with the Office of Financial Aid to compile and store information on scholarship and loan programs available to underrepresented group students. One aspect of this service will include staff support in advising minority students regarding the financial aid process and direct referral to financial aid services.
International Placement Program
f. The International Placement Program will provide greater service to both international and domestic students. MSU will continue to host a career fair or forum specifically targeted to the employment of international students and will increase the resources available to both domestic and international students concerning internship and employment opportunities throughout the world.
Volunteer Community Service Grant Program
g. The Division of Student Affairs and Services will seek sources of funding to support minority students who otherwise could not participate in volunteer community service because of the need to work for pay
Community Volunteers for International Programs
h. Voluntary organizations such as Community Volunteers for International Programs (CVIP) will be supported to encourage interactions between various groups in the University and community.
(In cooperation with the Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies)
23 To reverse a ten-year decline in the number of underrepresented minority graduate and graduate/professional students, every department/school in the University with a graduate or graduate/professional program that is underrepresented in certain minority groups will recruit at least one new underrepresented minority graduate student during the next academic year. Those units that have few women in their graduate programs will recruit at least one additional woman each academic year. Units that are underrepresented in minorities and women will recruit from both groups.
a. The Office of the Provost will continue to facilitate the linkages between colleges, Urban Affairs Programs, the Graduate School, and the offices of associate and assistant deans to achieve this goal. The Office of the Provost will provide travel support for recruitment if necessary.
b. The Graduate School will coordinate, monitor, and support the recruitment of minority students in cooperation with the Affirmative-Action Graduate Fellowship Awards Program (AAGFAP) and the colleges. This will include strengthening networks and linkages with alumni, community organizations, historically Black colleges, predominantly Hispanic colleges, colleges with high Asian American enrollments, tribal colleges, and colleges with high American Indian enrollments.
c. The Graduate School will offer additional four-year fellowships for underrepresented graduate students with remission of tuition.
d. The Graduate School in concert with the Office of the Provost and AAGFAP will form a small working advisory group representing a diversity of ethnic and cultural backgrounds in order to assure that the needs of diverse groups are considered. The Graduate Associate/Assistant Deans Group will serve as a University-wide Graduate Recruitment Committee for minority students with advice from the Graduate School's advisory group.
24 Fairs, internships and other special programs sponsored by the Graduate School, the Division of Student Affairs and Services, and other units will be continued and augmented to introduce underrepresented group students to the opportunities for graduate study at MSU.
a. The Graduate School, in cooperation with AAGFAP, will provide and seek support to expand programs and recruitment fairs such as "Enhancing Your Future," designed to encourage minorities to consider post-baccalaureate education.
b. The Division of Student Affairs and Services will extend its efforts to introduce undergraduates to career opportunities in student affairs work and to promote graduate study in higher education. Minority students will continue to be targeted. A statewide program recently initiated will be pursued and special attention will continue to be given to both academic programs and ways to finance graduate study.
c. Additional undergraduate student internships will be sought within the Division of Student Affairs and Services that will encourage minority students to become more familiar with the field and to pursue graduate study in higher education.
d. The Graduate School, in concert with the Office of the Provost, will coordinate, monitor, and support undergraduate (and high school) programs, such as the Summer Research Opportunity Program and the Research Internship Program, designed to increase the pool of potential minority graduate students.
25 The Graduate School, with deans, directors and department chairpersons, and/or the Division of Student Affairs and Services will help to create a congenial academic climate for underrepresented group graduate students.
a. Orientation, sponsorship, and mentoring programs as well as support programs and services will be designed both in academic units and at the University level to provide for an environment that will encourage underrepresented group members to complete graduate programs.
b. The Office of the Provost and the Graduate School will support the development of measures of the academic and learning/living climate for graduate education with special attention to underrepresented group graduate students, as a step toward making changes which will improve community support for the pursuit of excellence for all.
26 Increased attention will be given to appointing minorities and graduate students from other underrepresented groups to assistantships within academic units and the Division of Student Affairs and Services.
27 The Vice President for Finance and Operations in cooperation with the Office of the Provost will encourage hiring and promotion of members of federally protected minority groups, women, handicappers, and Vietnam-era veterans to University Support Staff positions, particularly where they are underrepresented.
a. All Units have a responsibility to initiate comprehensive recruitment and selection strategies to maximize diverse hiring and promotion at all levels.
b. All Units are responsible for assessing promotional tracks to ensure that diverse staff are consistently hired into these tracks and are provided work experience and training to help them qualify for promotions.
c. Hiring audits and annual affirmative-action reviews as part of the Support Unit Planning Program and College-Level Planning Program will provide the means for monitoring hiring, promotion and retention results.
28 The Office of Human Resources will provide units with assistance through the continuous recruitment and agency referral programs to support recruitment of underrepresented groups to the University Support Staff.
Continuous Hiring
a. Support units with underrepresented positions having limited availability of protected group candidates can work in partnership with the Vice President for Finance and Operations as needed to arrange transitional funding necessary to take advantage of targeted hiring opportunities when they arise, or to broaden possible recruitment or retention activities. As part of this "continuous recruitment process," support units are also encouraged to make referrals of candidates from underrepresented groups, seek candidates from nontraditional sources, and to make use of broadly defined job descriptions to encourage more flexible responses to recruitment opportunities.
Agency Referral Program
b. Human Resources will continue and expand its Community Agency Referral program through which underrepresented applicants are given consideration for vacancies. Particular attention will be paid to augmenting this program to identify qualified candidates for professional and technical positions.
29 Since an essential characteristic of a successful multicultural environment is that it supports its members in reaching their full potential, the Office of the Vice President for Finance and Operations reaffirms its commitment to ongoing and augmented staff orientation and development.
Orientation
a. New hires are to be given orientation and support to help them transition to MSU as a new working environment
Career Advising
b. The Office of Human Resources will make a career advising program available to support staff (possibly through linkages with the Division of Student Affairs and Services). Special attention will be given to helping women, minority, and handicapper staff members develop progressive career paths and to implement development plans.
Increasing Job Knowledge and Skills
c. Academic and support units will be encouraged to promote staff development activities such as credit or noncredit coursework, seminars, participation in professional organization activities, cross-training, reassignments, and project assignments. Staff development can also be supported through release time to attend courses, tuition reimbursement through the Educational Assistance Program, and departmental payment of training/development costs. Staff development is relevant at all levels, through University- and department-sponsored activities. The Vice President for Finance and Operations, the Provost, and the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services will look for demonstration of the commitment to staff development in the College-Level Planning Program and in the Support Unit Planning Process.
d. Also see "Improved Exit Interviews," Initiative 16.
30 The University commits itself to recruitment and retention of handicapper faculty, staff, and students.
a. To further define an affirmative-action plan for handicappers, the Assistant Provost and Assistant Vice President for Academic Human Resources and the Assistant Vice President for Human Resources, with the assistance of the Office of Monitoring and Affirmative-Action Compliance, will, in consultation with the President's Handicapper Advisory Committee, review processes through which representation goals might be established and recommend a plan to establish achievable goals.
b. The Assistant Provost for Undergraduate Education and Academic Services will review, and include where appropriate, information on access and opportunities for handicapper students within general recruitment and admissions information. Consideration will be given to the development of specific materials that target handicappers in the recruitment and admissions process.
31 In conjunction with the semester transition, the Office of the Provost will expedite CRUE's recommendations that courses concerned with national and international diversity be taught across the curriculum.
National and International Diversity in Curriculum and Instruction
a. Through the Integrative Studies Program as well as other curriculum revisions associated with the conversion to semesters, the University will implement CRUE recommendations for increasing national and international diversity in the curriculum.
b. In partnership with established units, the Office of the Provost will continue to support, workshops, grant programs, and other projects that assist individual faculty or units in creating new courses, expanding the scope of existing courses, and/or developing pedagogy that will facilitate the integration of national and international diversity in instruction and curriculum.
c. As part of the semester conversion project, the Office of the Provost in cooperation with the deans of the colleges has requested that one person in each college be identified to assist in monitoring course submissions to ensure the inclusion of national and international diversity.
Freshman-Year Experience Course
d. The Office of the Provost and the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services will cooperate in developing an approach to a freshman-year experience that will include issues of diversity within community and the development of cross-cultural understanding. The review of such a course will pass through regular governance channels.
Supplementing University Collections of Diversity Materials
e. Through the College-Level Planning Program and in partnership with the Director of the MSU Libraries and through the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology, the Office of the Provost will support supplementing University collections of printed and visual materials related to the development of high-quality instruction and research in national and international diversity and multicultural awareness.
Diversity in Lifelong Education
f. The Office of the Provost, through the Vice Provost for University Outreach, will develop lifelong education programs both on the campus and throughout the state that promote increased sensitivity and understanding related to diversity and multicultural awareness. In addition, the Vice-Provost for University Outreach is placing high priority on knowledge extension and application efforts that address the needs of distressed urban and rural communities throughout the Michigan. Many of these communities have a disproportionately high percentage of minority residents.
Linking Academic and Co-Curricular Activities
g. To enhance multicultural awareness and promote the value of diversity, renewed attention will be given to the CRUE recommendations that faculty consider incorporating cultural and other campus events into courses whenever possible and that the University review strategies for building a closer relationship between the students' academic programs, co-curricular activities, and support services. Efforts will be made to include diversity-related co-curricular activities included on an electronic calendar. See Initiative 47c.
32 In keeping with the University's commitment to outreach, the Office of the Provost will encourage and support multidisciplinary cooperation in research and teaching to address both societal needs and underlying social issues related to diversity and cross-cultural understanding.
Multidisciplinary Institutes
a. The Office of the Provost will seek seed funding to support centers and institutes, such as the Julian Samora Institute and various area study centers of International Studies and Programs that foster research, teaching, and outreach activities related to diversity and/or cross-cultural issues.
Multidisciplinary Proposal Support
b. The Office of the Provost, in cooperation with the Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies and Dean of the Graduate School, will convene cross-University planning groups to identify faculty experts interested in multidisciplinary proposal preparation. The groups will seek funding for research and demonstration projects to improve human enablement opportunities and to focus on improving access to educational and economic opportunities for underrepresented groups.
33 In partnership with the colleges, the Office of the Provost will continue to support programs, courses, and activities - including the Women's Studies Program, Ethnic Studies, and Gay and Lesbian Studies - that recognize and promote contributions of women, minorities, and gay males and lesbians and that focus on diversity and cross-cultural understanding.
a. All-University academic programs, including co-curricular activities such as regular conferences, seminars in women's studies, ethnic studies, and gay and lesbian studies, will also be supported in cooperation with academic units.
b. The Office of the Provost will support the development of a major in women's studies upon the positive recommendation of the College of Arts and Letters and the College of Social Science and in partnership with these colleges
c. In keeping with CRUE and as part of the semester transition, the Office of the Provost will encourage colleges and departments to support the development of women's studies, ethnic studies, and gay and lesbian studies courses and the infusion of women's studies, ethnic studies, and gay and lesbian studies materials into courses in order to foster research and teaching about issues related to the lives, contributions, and perspectives of women and minorities.
d. The Office of the Provost will provide support assistance in the form of grants, workshops, seminars, released time, and travel for faculty or for established units to encourage the development of new courses or to expand the scope of existing courses to include information about women, ethnic and religious minorities, and gay males and lesbians as part of the semester conversion and CRUE recommendations regarding the integration of national and international diversity into the curriculum.
e. The Office of the Provost, through the Office of Adult Services, will promote opportunities for women and minorities to continue their education at MSU after major interruptions in their formal education due to other life responsibilities.
34 The University will encourage the development of improvements in teaching to meet the needs of a diverse, multicultural student body.
Teaching Writing, Mathematics, and Science
a. In response to CRUE recommendations, the Office of the Provost will increase support for faculty assistance workshops, research, conference attendance, and other means that lead to the improved instruction for all students, especially in writing, mathematics, and science courses. Special attention will be given to encouraging full participation of women and minorities in science and engineering careers where these groups continue to be severely underrepresented.
Lilly Endowment Teaching Fellowships
b. The Office of the Provost will help to support a diverse group of eight junior faculty leaders each year for three years as part of the Lilly Endowment Teaching Fellows Program. As part of the instructional improvement program planned by MSU, several participants will be concerned with instruction for multicultural audiences and pedagogy associated with the integration of national and international diversity in the curriculum. Special University-wide programs associated with the Lilly Teaching Fellows initiative will be open to all faculty.
Developing Future Teachers
c. The College of Education, in cooperation with the Office of the Provost will review the current curriculum in teacher preparation and make recommendations regarding ways in which it can be improved so that future teachers will be better able to meet the needs and learning styles of students from diverse cultures.
d. The College of Education, in cooperation with other colleges, will continue and enhance special efforts to recruit and train minority teachers for K-12 schools.
Learning Environment for Handicappers
e. The University will continue to provide support for the Office of Programs for Handicapper Students in order to sustain and improve the learning environment for handicappers.
f. The University will continue to provide interpreter services to the hearing-impaired and to maintain services to students with visual characteristics through the Alternative Format Services facility in the MSU Library and through the volunteer services of Tower Guard.
g. The Office of Programs for Handicapper Students will expand collaborative efforts with other units within the University, such as the Learning Resources Center, to maximize the readiness of these units to offer learning services to students with handicapper characteristics. Alternative learners will continue to receive special attention in these efforts.
h. The Office of the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology will continue to provide academic technology support such as special software, hardware, FM assistant listening devices for handicappers directly and through the Office of Handicapper Services
35 The University will continue to support outreach programs that advance diversity within community.
Division of Student Affairs and Services
a. The Division of Student Affairs and Services will continue to expand its commitment to developing educational conferences that promote excellence and diversity within community.
Economic Development
b. The Office of the Provost, through the Vice Provost for University Outreach, will continue to support and expand economic outreach efforts for minorities and women throughout the state in programs such as the Office of Minority Business Assistance and Michigan Partnership for Economic Development Assistance.
Faculty and Staff Development
c. The Office of the Provost, through the Office of the Assistant Provost and Assistant Vice President for Academic Human Resources, in cooperation with the Vice Provost for University Outreach and the Vice presidents for Finance and Operations and Student Affairs and Services, will support and encourage participation in faculty development and outreach projects such as the MSU/W.K. Kellogg Foundation "Meet Michigan" Orientation Program that underlines the importance of University involvement in diversity issues throughout the State of Michigan.
d. The Department of Public Safety will develop an internal diversity outreach and staff development program involving presentations by and interactions between staff members and University minority student groups.
36 Increased attention will be given to the professional preparation of counselors and other student affairs professionals to better prepare them to work effectively with an increasingly diverse student population.
a. Counseling Center interns will be required to spend a portion of their time working with MECCA and gain experience in counseling racial and ethnic minority clients.
b. Graduate students in higher education will increasingly be encouraged to pursue study through courses and internships to enhance their understanding and ability to work with students of diverse backgrounds.
37 An undergraduate student leadership course offered through the College of Education in conjunction with the Division of Student Affairs and Services will give increased attention to minorities and women in leadership
38The Office of the Provost and the Office of the Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies will support a research project dealing with the contributions of traditional minorities and other diversity groups in the history of MSU with the intent of publishing a study that will ensure the recognition of these groups in MSU traditions.
39 Michigan State University will continue to support partnership efforts with colleges and programs to bring faculty members from historically Black colleges and universities to this campus for faculty exchanges, visiting appointments, and additional graduate work. This effort will create a greater presence of Black/African American scholars on campus, provide networks with these colleges and universities, and help acquaint MSU faculty and students with these institutions. Such programs support the concept of consolidated arrangements on behalf of mutual interest between MSU and institutions with large or predominantly minority populations.
40 The University will seek to improve campus safety and security for racial, religious, and ethnic minorities; women; handicappers; and gay men and lesbians by disseminating information about appropriate campus behavior and illegal discrimination, by improving enforcement of regulations and policies, and by increasing training sessions on safety education and assault.
a. Programs and services within the Student Affairs and Services Safety Education and Sexual Assault Program will expand emphasis on specific programs for men.
b. Increased attention will be directed toward personal safety of faculty, staff, and students through both formal and informal instructional programs.
c. Orientation programs for new students will place greater emphasis on issues of safety and security. Because a majority of new students reside on campus, special attention will continue to be given to educational programs within residence halls.
d. The Department of Public Safety will expand its emphasis on community involvement by encouraging faculty, staff, and students to work with DPS officers through its community policing program. DPS will continue its safety education role in parent orientation programs and will provide support to student orientation programs.
41 Harassment based on race, creed, religion, ethnic origin, sex, age, political persuasion, or sexual orientation, and denigration of worth or abilities of handicappers or others are forms of invidious discrimination that have no place in the MSU community. Supervisors, administrators, and others in leadership positions are responsible for communicating and enforcing the University's policies on non-discrimination and harassment in their units.
Discrimination Complaints
A. The University will publicize the role of the Anti-Discrimination Judicial Board (ADJB) and the procedures through which discrimination or harassment complaints should be addressed. The University will work to create an educational climate in which an understanding of the values of diversity promotes community and discourages harassment and discrimination prohibited by the University.
Harassment
b. The University will establish new guidelines and procedures for identifying and eliminating harassment in the academic community.
Special Assistance for Students
c. A restructured and expanded Office of Minority Student Affairs will increase staff interaction with individual minority students and student groups and provide students with a better understanding of resources available and assist them in addressing incidents of discrimination and harassment.
d. The Office of Student Affairs and Services will further develop a system for reporting of alleged discrimination and harassment in order to help students in utilizing campus resources to address grievances and to identify and intervene in situations where patterns of discriminatory and/or harassing behaviors are evident.
Conflict Intervention Strategies
e. New intervention strategies will be developed by the Division of Student Affairs and Services to mediate disputes and increase understanding when conflicts between individual students or student groups of differing backgrounds occur. Such strategies may be employed in lieu of, or in addition to, formal judicial proceedings.
f. The Department of Public Safety will investigate violations of state and federal laws in regard to ethnic intimidation of faculty, staff, students, and visitors. The Department of Public Safety will also include information about these laws in relevant training programs.
42 The University is committed to academic freedom and to constitutionally protected freedom of expression. At the same time, it is equally committed to eliminating the use of biased language in the conduct of its business and to educating the community about the negative effects of language that degrades or minimizes the worth of individuals based on race, religion, ethnicity, handicap, gender, or sexual orientation. These twin goals create a tension which must continually be addressed.
a. University administrators will hold their staffs accountable for avoiding the use of language, whether written or oral, that reflects, and communicates, a bias on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity, handicap, age, gender or sexual orientation.
b. The Office of the Provost and the Vice President for Student Affairs and Services will support the efforts of the College of Communication Arts and Sciences to develop workshops and other means of disseminating information on bias-free communication.
c. Faculty, staff, and students, in all of their interactions, will be encouraged to confront each other in situations where language is perceived to be biased. Only by calling attention to such language can we educate ourselves and others to the chilling effect of bias in our communications.
43 The University will support additional orientation and other development programs for faculty, staff, and students to promote cross-cultural understanding and diversity within community.
Faculty and Staff
a. The Assistant Provost and Assistant Vice President for Academic Human Resources in cooperation with the Assistant Provost for Support Services and Racial, Ethnic, and Multicultural Issues will create and encourage attendance at an expanded and improved set of faculty and administrator interactive workshops and orientation seminars dealing with valuing differences, affirmative action, and developing a multicultural community. A workshop on diversity within community for chairpersons and directors will be a high priority.
b. The Assistant Vice President for Human Resources, with the Assistant for Multicultural Development Coordinator, will develop diversity training programs for supervisors and staff that address racism, sexism, heterosexism, back-lash issues, constructive conflict resolution, bias-free communication, and awareness and appreciation of cultural differences to ensure that all supervisors are conversant with key principles of the MSU IDEA, their own roles and responsibilities, and the University's goals and underlying philosophical perspective on diversity and pluralism. A workshop on diversity for supervisors will be a high priority, since supervisors are responsible for promoting cross-cultural understanding and implementing MSU IDEA principles.
c. The Office of the Provost, in cooperation with the deans of the colleges and Supportive Services staff, will develop increased opportunities for academic advisors at all levels of the University to attend workshops and other educational activities to increase their understanding and appreciation for diversity and to enhance their ability to work effectively with students of different backgrounds.
d. There will be continuing review and revision of training and educational programs conducted for the Division of Student Affairs and Services staff who work directly with students in order to increase their understanding, and appreciation for diversity and to enhance their ability to work effectively with students of different backgrounds. For residence hall staff at all levels, diversity training will continue to be required and enhanced.
Students
e. The Division of Student Affairs and Services, in collaboration with the Office of the Provost, will develop student orientation programs to promote the value of diversity and increase understanding and appreciation for cultural differences.
f. In program planning, in advising student groups, and in working with advisers to student organizations, the Division of Student Affairs and Services will promote activities that further interaction among individuals of differing backgrounds and heritages.
g. The Office of Minority Student Affairs will help ensure that there are campus social and cultural programs that represent their interests and reflect and celebrate their cultural heritage.
h. The Internationalizing Student Life Program will be further developed, in close association with the Office of International Students and Scholars, to increase understanding through interaction among individuals of differing cultures, improve cross-cultural communication skills, and expand knowledge of the increasingly interdependent global society. In addition, social and cultural exchange between domestic and international students will be enhanced through recreational, social, and cultural programs sponsored by University Housing Programs and Intramural Sports and Recreative Services.
i. New recreational and fitness activities will be pursued by Intramural Sports and Recreative Services to expand the participation of handicappers
j. Within the Departments of Student Life and Residence Life, additional attention will be given to leadership training for minorities and women.
k. The Counseling Center will expand its service to international students.
l. The Office of Minority Student Affairs will expand its work with units across campus in order to develop a stronger network of support services that can better address the interests and needs of minority students.
m. A minority mentoring program will be established by the Office of Minority Student Affairs and Career Development and Placement Services to provide students with role models in the academic and corporate worlds who can assist students in assessing and pursuing viable courses of study and career options.
n. The Minority Career Fair will be expanded by Career Development and Placement Services and fairs will be added to encourage minorities to consider careers in specific fields (e.g., in communication).
44 The University will encourage additional programs, conferences, art collections, exhibits, and performances to support cross-cultural understanding and to reflect the national and international contributions of minorities, women, handicappers, religious and ethnic groups, and gay men and lesbians.
a. Kresge Art Museum will be encouraged to develop a collection and to hold additional exhibitions of works by or about underrepresented groups.
b. Wharton Center for Performing Arts, the Department of Theatre, the College of Music, and other such units will be encouraged to cooperate in increasing performances of works by national and international artists who are members of underrepresented groups.
c. The MSU Museum will be encouraged to acquire materials and hold additional exhibitions of materials reflecting the cultural contributions of handicappers; women; racial and religious, and ethnic minorities; and gay men and lesbians.
d. The Office of the Provost, the Graduate School, and the colleges, separately or in partnership, will encourage conferences and seminars in science and engineering that feature contributions of racial, religious, and ethnic minorities; gay men and lesbians; women; and handicappers.
e. The University will foster cross-cultural interaction and understanding through support for ceremonial occasions that celebrate the cultural values of diverse groups.
f. The University will support speakers and forums that promote dialogue and civil debate about cultural diversity and advance cross-cultural communication and understanding.
g. Administrators of all units will be asked to encourage greater faculty, staff, and students participation at events dealing with diversity and pluralism.
h. Student organizations and student governing groups will be encouraged and supported in efforts to promote cross-cultural understanding through the activities and programs they sponsor.
45 With women accounting for more than half of the University's work force and with a growing presence of single parents and two-career couples, University faculty and staff increasingly must balance work and family responsibilities. As an employer, MSU must respond to this need if it intends to recruit and retain high quality faculty and staff and to ensure that MSU's environment supports its members as they strive to reach their full potential. MSU's family-supportive arrangements will vary based on differences in specific situations, but may include the following.
Flexibility in Working Arrangements
a. Ways to increase flexibility in working hours without a negative effect on career paths through part-time arrangements, flex-time schedules for staff, flex-appointments, job sharing, and work-at-home arrangements will be explored.
b. Departments are encouraged to support flexible work arrangements, as they can facilitate a successful work-family balance for their employees while providing related benefits for the University including reduced turnover, fewer absences, increased productivity. This entails giving positive consideration to nontraditional work schedules and employees who work them, in order to support working parents while optimizing staff contributions.
Parental Leaves
c. Parental leaves in cases of birth or adoption are currently under review for academic staff, including a realistic assessment of the impact of such leaves on the timing of tenure decisions.
Child Care
d. For students who are parents, the availability of child care is often an important factor in their ability to succeed--and in many cases, even persist -- with their education. With an apparent increase in the number of single-parent families and a greater need for students to combine work and study, provision for child care requires greater attention. In the recruitment and retention of both graduate and undergraduate students with children, child care can be an important factor.
e. Representatives from the Office of the Provost, the Vice President for Finance and Operations, and the Vice President for Student Affairs will work with an advisory committee to define the University's role and to develop a long-term strategy for implementing child care programs. These programs will augment the current and pending programs for child care, referral, emergency care, and dependent care spending accounts.
46 The University will support measures to provide for more involvement of underrepresented group faculty, student, and staff on governance and other committees at all levels of the University.
Faculty
a. The University will support and/or initiate proposals that provide for appointments of underrepresented group faculty and academic staff members to all major standing University-level governance committees. New measures for election from colleges, and means of recognition in the reward system will also be developed. The Office of the Provost will encourage increased representation of women, racial and ethnic minorities, handicappers and gay men and lesbians throughout academic governance, with the initial focus on University-level committees. The Secretary of Academic Governance, with the University Committee on Academic Governance, will provide consultation for the Provost to facilitate this initiative.
Students
b. Student Affairs and Services staff will increasingly encourage student governing groups, as well as student organizations, to increase participation of underrepresented groups, to address their interests and needs, and to recognize and reward their contributions.
Staff
c. The support areas will encourage increased participation of underrepresented groups on administrative, search, advisory, and ad-hoc committees.
47 The way the University presents itself in print and visual media conveys its values on- and off-campus. University administrators will assume a leadership role in the attempt to ensure the highest standards of sensitivity to principles of diversity and pluralism in all MSU media presentations which are their responsibility.
a. The MSU Press will be encouraged to continue soliciting manuscripts that deal with minority, women's, gay men and lesbian, and handicapper issues. Colleges will encourage faculty to submit such manuscripts to the MSU Press for consideration.
b. Units under the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology, such as the Instructional Media Center and Broadcasting Services, will continue their steadily increasing activities on behalf of MSU IDEA-related projects, such as augmenting video and film collections related to diversity; consulting and/or producing graphics, video, and film presentations that help to educate about the advantages of cultural diversity and the unacceptable nature of discriminatory behavior; and providing photographic services and assistance for exhibits and displays relating to diversity and pluralism.
c. In cooperation with the Office of Assistant Provost for Undergraduate Education and Academic Services, and the Assistant Provost for Student Academic Support Services and Racial, Ethnic, and Multicultural Issues, the Vice Provost for Computing and Technology will continue to facilitate the development of an electronic calendar that will include diversity-related events.
d. The Division of Student Affairs and Services will intensify its efforts to eliminate discrimination and harassment through the distribution of posters, flyers, and brochures that make clear the University's expectations and that advise students of courses of action available to them if discrimination or harassment occurs.
e. University Relations will continue to provide its increasing support for diversity-related projects and programs.
48 The Office of the Provost and the Vice President for Finance and Operations will support separate surveys of faculty and academic staff and University support staff to determine opinions on diversity and other human resource issues. These survey results will be used as a baseline to help design programs to promote multicultural understanding and support.
49 The University will continue to support activities that increase accessibility to academic programs and enable students, faculty, and staff to participate in improved working and learning environments.
Handicappers
a. The University will continue to implement the Michigan State University Transition Plan, which aims to make MSU programs accessible and accommodating to handicappers. Indeed, the MSU IDEA continues to be responsive to the needs of the MSU handicapper community and surpasses previous minimum requirements in facility and program enhancements. MSU will extend its already established reputation for excellence in environmental design when making facilities more accommodating for everyone.
b. The University will continue to support progress on accessibility for handicappers as outlined in the Handicapper Transition Plan.
c. The University will compile data from a number of units and report progress on handicapper issues including accessibility, as described in the Handicapper Transition Plan and as implemented in response to individual requests and other projects related to building or renovation programs beyond those referenced in the plan.
d. In order to effectively address the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a University task force has been established to determine the act's ramifications for Michigan State University and to establish a plan for compliance. Special attention will be directed to issues of employment and transportation as well as facilities.
e. The Office of Facilities and Space Planning will conduct a broad review of the University to assess compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
f. MSU is committed to continue working with other universities and with state government to find sources for funding research and development initiatives, such as the Michigan Consortium on Enabling Technology, to apply the resources of education and technology to enhance the abilities of handicappers.
g. The Office of the Vice President for Finance and Operations commits to review handicapper transportation and parking issues in the context of developing of a long range parking and transportation plan for MSU.
Students Who Cannot Come to MSU
h. MSU will expand access to its many educational programs through the use of educational technology designed to serve people who cannot come to the MSU campus
50 The University will initiate efforts, as resources permit, to create a "Center for a New Community," a multicultural center for students, faculty, and staff that will be dedicated to diversity and excellence on campus. This Center will provide a place where members of the MSU community can gather socially and professionally in a collegial atmosphere. The Center will serve as a meeting place for faculty, staff, and student groups concerned with improving the multicultural community on campus. (See Initiative 8). The University will also encourage other community-building activities such as increased interactions among faculty, students and staff.
The following list of definitions is provided in the interest of producing a shared vocabulary associated with current attempts to advance diversity and pluralism at Michigan State University. Most of these terms appear in MSU IDEA II.
Affirmative Action - " Affirmative action means making a special effort to ensure that groups of people previously discriminated against, such as women, minorities, and handicappers, are fully represented in the University community and that social or systemic barriers that limit their rights, privileges and performance within the University community are eradicated . . .Affirmative action became a concept in federal law and regulations because certain groups of people historically have been subjected to discrimination or exclusion because of their race, sex, or other characteristics and are now underrepresented in various segments of American life. The overall concept requires that University take positive and continuous steps to overcome the effects of such past exclusion through special and systematic efforts in the recruitment, employment, retention, and promotion of members of such groups." (from Human Rights, The University's Commitment, Michigan State University)
African American - See Black
Alaskan Native - See American Indian
American Indian - All persons having origins in any of the original peoples of North America and maintaining identifiable tribal affiliations through membership and participation or community identification.
Antisemitism - A term historically applied to fear and hatred of Jews and religious bigotry against Jews.
Asian American - All persons having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands.
Backlash - A term used in the context of diversity and pluralism issues to suggest a sharp reaction to affirmative action and other means of advancing diversity .
Bisexual - A term for women and men whose sexual/affectional identity is oriented to members of both the same and the opposite sex. A sexual/affectional orientation that is separate from those of both heterosexuals and lesbians and gay men (The Oregon Report).
Black - All persons having origins in any of the African racial groups not of Hispanic origin.
Climate - The prevailing temper or environmental conditions that characterize a group or a period in time.
Community - A social group where members may be from different cultures and backgrounds and have different perspectives, but share some common purposes, needs and shared priorities (Nisbet, 1971; Oliver and Newman, 1969); engage in communication and interaction (Friesen; Oliver and Newman); work together to ensure the security and safety of members of the social group (Ardrey, 1970; Friesen); cooperate so as to share authority (Friesen; Oliver and Newman); have some sense of identity with, membership in and commitment to the social group (Ardrey; Friesen; Nisbet); and also value and recognize individual needs within the group (Friesen; Nisbet).
CORRAGE - The Council on the Review of Research and Graduate Education. An all-University representative council that developed a report that included recommendations for demographic diversity and emphasized the importance of diversity in the curriculum and intellectual life of the University for maintaining excellence in graduate education and research.
Cross-cultural - A descriptor indicating interaction between two or more cultural groups.
CRUE - The Council to Review Undergraduate Education. An all-University representative council that developed "opportunities for renewal," a series of recommendations to improve undergraduate education at MSU. The council's recommendations were published in 1988. Included were recommendations regarding the importance of demographic diversity and diversity in the curriculum and intellectual life of undergraduate students.
Culture - The integrated pattern of human behavior that includes thought, speech, action, and artifacts and depends on people's capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations; the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group.
". . . culture can be thought of as the common, learned way of life shared by the members of a society, consisting of tools, techniques, social institutions, attitudes, beliefs, motivations, and systems of value known to the group" (Foster, 1973).
Discrimination - As act or acts, the effect of which are adverse to the employment opportunities of one or more individuals because of his/her gender, race, religion, national origin, or other factors, which under particular laws may not be considered as a basis for employment actions. Unlawful discrimination generally may be either intentional or unintentional.
The restrictive treatment of a person or group based on prejudicial assumptions of group characteristics, rather than on individual merit.
Diversity - The presence of representatives from a rich variety of different cultures, backgrounds, and perspectives.
Equal opportunity - The concept that everyone will be judged solely on the basis of qualifications and performance. The person's sex, race, ethnic background, religious affiliation, political persuasion, sexual orientation, physical condition or appearance, and age are not negative factors in decisions about employment or participation in any program or activity sponsored by the University.
Federally protected groups - term referring to historically disadvantaged racial, gender, or handicapper groups who fall under affirmative-action procedures. This includes women, traditional racial minorities, (Blacks, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Native Americans) handicappers, Vietnam-era veterans.
Gay - This term can be used in reference to both lesbians and homosexual males. Although many lesbians consider "gay" a male term, it remains the most frequent general term for female and male homosexuals (The Oregon Report).
Goals and Timetables - MSU has analyzed its work force on the basis of the availability of women and minorities in the various disciplines or job types. The purpose of this analysis is to identify departments or units in which women and minorities are underrepresented in comparison to the available workforce of such people. When a department or unit is found in which women and/or minorities are underutilized, the University projects the number of opportunities to hire during a period of time and establishes hiring goals that are designed ultimately to bring the percentage of employment at least to the level of availability. These goals and timetables are periodically updated and provide benchmarks for evaluating the University's progress and for identifying areas in which there have been opportunities but in which very little progress has been made in hiring of women and minorities. It is important to remember that these goals are not quotas to establish certain positions for only women or minorities, nor are they ceilings that, once achieved absolve the University of any further responsibility.
Handicapper - Preferred MSU community term that signifies competence regardless of handicap and that focuses on competence rather than condition. Used instead of "handicapped" (limited) or "disabled" (incompetent or legally disqualified).
Harassment - To worry and impede by repeated raids; to annoy persistently; includes gender harassment and sexual harassment
Hispanic - All persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central American, or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race.
Homosexual, homosexuality - "A person regardless of sex, who engages in, desires to engage in, or intends to engage in same-sex sexual acts . . . This term is offensive to many gay men and lesbians because it focuses on sexuality instead of a more all encompassing idea such as discrimination in employment, legal protection, and access to resources against members of a particular group of people" (Oregon Task Force Report).
Homophobia - The fear of homosexuality in oneself or others.
Heterosexism - The assumption that everyone is heterosexual; social structures and practices which serve to elevate or enforce heterosexuality while subordinating or suppressing homosexuality.
Interactive pluralism - A term first used in the Stanford University Diversity Self Study, meaning a community where all ethnic groups can engage their differences in a process of mutual enrichment . . . where diverse groups and "majority" members acknowledge and build mutual respect for their similarities as well as their differences, a community of faculty, staff, and students who share a belief in mutual respect and who view their racial and ethnic diversity as a unique asset.
Lesbian - "A woman whose primary erotic, psychological, emotional and social interest is in a member of her own sex, even though that interest may not be overtly expressed." (The Oregon Report).
"A range . . . of woman-identified experience, not simply the fact that a woman has had or consciously desired genital sexual experience with another woman . . . but including many more forms of primary intensity between and among women" (Rich)
Minority Advisory Council (MAC) - An MSU council composed of members of underrepresented groups. It provides advice to the President on minority issues.
Multicultural awareness -A "learned ability for intercultural communication; development of crosscultural human relations skills; acquired ability to encounter new cultures with comfort and appreciation and view the experience as a benefit" (Hoopes).
Multicultural organization/environment - An organization or environment that shows "genuine commitment toward diverse representation of its membership; sensitivity towards maintaining an open, supportive, and responsive environment; effort to purposefully include elements of diverse cultures in ongoing operations, and authenticity in responding to issues confronting it" (Strong and Barr).
Monocultural - Having experienced a single culture and viewing it as the only culture; ethnocentrism; assertion of personal and cultural superiority; dividing the world into two parts, "we" and "they".
Native American - See American Indian
Nondiscrimination - See Equal Opportunity
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) - The office within the U.S. Department of Labor which is delegated the responsibility to administer Executive Order 11246 and its implementing affirmative-action regulations.
Pluralism - "A state or condition of society in which members of diverse ethnic, racial, religious, or social groups maintain an autonomous participation in and development of their traditional culture or special interest while [recognizing] . . . difference and coexisting within a common civilization." (Webster's Unabridged Dictionary)
Pluralistic community - A community whose members believe that diverse members can coexist in a given society, tolerate each other's differences and share benefits within a common governing system.
PLUS - Planning for a Lifelong University System. An R3 outreach platform that calls for advancing the extension and application of University resources to meet the needs of people as fundamental to the MSU mission.
Power - Possession of control, authority, or influence over others
Prejudice - A negative or hostile attitude toward a person or group formed without just grounds or sufficient knowledge and based on negative stereotypes. Prejudice is the result of "prejudgment" and can lead to discrimination.
Protected groups - Groups protected against discrimination and considered for affirmative-action goals and procedures federal law. Includes Blacks, American Indians, Hispanics, Asian Pacific Americans, Women, Handicappers, and Vietnam-era Veterans. See the definitions of "Federally Protected Groups" and "underrepresented groups."
R3 - Refocus, rebalance, and refine: the Michigan State University special strategic planning program initiated in 1986-7 to prepare the University for challenges of the future. R3 is an integrated planning effort that advances changing University priorities by means of major programmatic review, new initiatives, and related reallocation of resources. The plan includes a series of platform documents dealing with the review of undergraduate education (CRUE), the review of research and graduate education (CORRAGE), the review of outreach and Lifelong Education Programs (PLUS), a comprehensive diversity plan (MSU IDEA), and an administrative management plan (AMPS).
Racial minority - In its affirmative action program, MSU uses a definition of minority that is consistent with federal regulations. This approach ensures clarity of communication within the University and between the University and external agencies. Specifically, there are four groups of people who are classified as racial minorities for affirmative action purposes: Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians or Alaskan Natives, and Asians or Pacific Islanders.
Racism - Individual or institutional prejudice or discrimination based on the belief that race is a primary factor determining human traits and abilities. Racism holds that genetic, or inherited, differences produce the inherent superiority or inferiority of one race to another (Anti-Defamation League, Study Guide; "Facing Difference: Living Together on Campus" video).
Religious bigotry - Prejudice or discrimination against all members of a particular religious group based on negative perceptions of their religious beliefs and practices or on negative group stereotypes
Reverse discrimination - Though the law contains no provision defining "reverse discrimination," the term is used popularly in reference to perceived exclusion of whites or males in favor of minorities or women. Inherent in this use of the term is the allegation that members of protected classes are treated preferentially not on the basis of their qualifications and historical discrimination, but merely because they are members of protected classes.
Sexual harassment - A form of sex discrimination, which is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to guidelines issued by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 1980, engaging in or permitting sexual harassment is a discriminatory employment practice that violates federal equal employment opportunity laws. Making suggestive comments, initiating unwelcome physical contact, or demanding sexual favors can easily be recognized as potential harassment situations. More uncertain are situations where traditional sex roles have been reversed or where perceptions of others enter the picture. The federal government in 1980 issued criteria to help gauge whether unwelcome sexual advances or other conduct of a sexual nature is sexual harassment. The criteria are:
Sexism - Conscious or unconscious action or institutional structure that subordinates a person or group because of gender.
Sexual preference - Term connoting that one is free to choose a particular sexual identity (The Oregon Report).
Sexual orientation - Term suggesting an individual is naturally inclined toward a particular sexual identity. Some experts say that orientations are set up in early childhood while others would note that orientations may be quite open and flexible throughout the entire life cycle (The Oregon Report).
Stereotypes - A stereotype is a preconceived or oversimplified generalization about an entire group of people without regard for their individual differences. While often negative, stereotypes may also be complimentary. Yet even positive stereotypes can have negative impact and can feed into prejudice.
Straight - Another term for heterosexual
Tolerance - Sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with one's own.
Underrepresented groups - In recruitment, employment, and benefits issues the term "underrepresented groups" refers specifically to traditional racial minorities, women, and handicappers protected by federal mandate. See the definition of "protected groups."
Underutilization/underutilized - Having fewer minorities or women in a particular job group than would reasonably be expected by their availability
Xenophobic - Fear and hared of strangers or foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign
Action Plan: Recruitment and Retention of Black Students at The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio: the Office of Academic Affairs, 1987.
Allen, Jeffner, ed. Lesbian Philosophies and Cultures. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 1990.
Altman, Dennis. The Homosexualization of America: The Americanization of the Homosexual. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.
American Council on Education. The New Agenda of Women for Higher Education: A Report of the A.C.E. Commission on Women in Higher Education. Washington D.C.: American Council on Education, 1987.
American Council on Education/Education Commission of the States. One-Third of a Nation. May 1988.
Ardrey, Robert. The Social Contract. New York: Atheneum, 1970.
Bell, Alan K. and Martin S. Weinberg. Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978.
___. Sexual Preferences: It's Development in Men and Women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981.
Birnbaum, Robert. Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1983.
Bonner, Ralph W. "The Challenge of Change: Strengthening the System for Educational Opportunity, Equality, and Diversity." East Lansing, Michigan: Department of Human Relations, Michigan State University, 1988.
Boswell, John. Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Boyer, Ernest L. College. Campus Life: In Search of Community, New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
___.College: The Undergraduate Experience in America. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1987.
Brown, Howard. Familiar Faces, Hidden Lives. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1989.
Building a Multiracial, Multicultural University Community. Palo Alto, California: University Committee on Minority Issues, Standford University, 1990.
"The Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students." Washington, D.C.: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, 1986.
Changing America: The New Face of Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C.: The Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology, 1988.
Clark, Don. Loving Someone Gay. Berkeley: Celestial Arts, 1987.
Comprehensive Minority Faculty Development Program. Birmingham, Alabama: University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1988.
Cortes, Carlos E. "Pluribus & Unum, The Quest for Community Amid Diversity." Change. Vol. 23, No. 5 (September/October 1991), pp. 8-13.
"Cross-Racial Collegiality: Trouble in Academe," Black Issues in Education. November 10, 1988.
Curry, Hayden and Denis Clifford. A Legal Guide for Lesbian and Gay Couples. Berkeley: Nolo Press, 1989.
D'Emilio, John. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
Daniels, Lee A. "Diversity, Correctness, & Campus Life, A Closer Look." Change. Vol. 23, No. 5 (September/October 1991), pp. 16-20.
Darden, Joe T., et al. The State of Black Michigan: 1991. East Lansing, Michigan: Urban Affairs Programs and The Michigan Council of Urban League Executives, 1991.
Duberman, M.B., M. Vicinus and G. Chauncey, eds. Hidden From the Past: Reclaiming the Gay Lesbian Past. 1989.
Ettorre, E.M. Lesbians, Women, and Society. Boston: Routledge & Kegan, 1980.
Farrant, Patricia A. and Alice Miller, eds. Initiatives. Special Issue on Women's Centers. Vol. 51, Nos. 2 and 3 (Summer 1988). Washington, D.C.: National Association of Women Deans, Administrators and Counselors.
Fleming, Jacqueline. Blacks in College: A Comparative Study of Students' Success in Black and in White Institutions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
Focus on Minorities: Synopsis of State Higher Education Initiatives. Denver: Education Commission of the States and the State Higher Education Executive Officers, 1987.
Gamson, Zelda. "Five Takes on 'PC,' Diversity and Community: The View from Student Affairs." Change. Vol. 23, No. 5 (September/October 1991), pp. 40-47.
Gardner, John W. Leadership Papers. Washington, D.C., Independent Sector, 1986.
Green, Madeline F., ed. Minorities on Campus: A Handbook for Diversity. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1988.
Greenberg, D.F. The Construction of Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Greene, Bernard and Linda Zimbler. National Center for Education Statistics, Survey Report:Profile of Handicapped Students in Postsecondary Education, 1987. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 1989.
Hamill, Pete. "Breaking the Silence." Esquire. March, 1988. pp. 91-102.
Handbook for Faculty Searches with Special Reference to Affirmative Action and Diversity. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University: Office of the Provost, Michigan State University, 1989.
Harris, Robert L., Jr. Black Studies in the United States. New York: Ford Foundation, 1990.
Headley, Linda and Frances Spring. "Minority Enrollment in Colleges and Universities in Michigan." Public Policy Advisor. Public Sector Reports. July 27, 1990. Lansing, Michigan: Public Sector Consultants.
Hill, Patrick J. "Multiculturalism, The Crucial Philosophical and Organizational Issues." Change. Vol. 23, No. 4 (July/August 1991). pp. 38-47.
Hodgkinson, Harold L. Higher Education: Diversity is Our Middle Name. Washington, D.C.: The National Institute of Independent Colleges and Universities, 1986.
___. Michigan and Its Educational System: Another Look. Institute for Educational Leadership, Inc., 1989.
___. Michigan: The State and Its Educational System. Washington D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership, Inc., 1987.
Hudalgo, Nitza M., Ceasar L. McDowell, and Emilie V. Siddle., eds. "Facing Racism in Education." Harvard Educational Review, Reprint Series No. 21. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 1990.
Human Rights: The University's Commitment. East Lansing, Michigan: Department of Human Relations, Michigan State University, n.d.
In Every Classroom: The Report of the President's Select Committee for Lesbian and Gay Concerns. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Office of Student Life Policy and Services, the State University of New Jersey, Rutgers, 1989.
Johnson, William B. and Arnold E. Packer. Workforce 2000. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hudson Institute Inc., 1987.
Justus, Joyce, ed. The University of California in the Twenty-First Century: Successful Approaches to Faculty Diversity. Berkeley, California: Office of the President, University of California, 1987.
Katz, Judith H. White Awareness, A Handbook for Anti-Racism Training. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1978.
The Madison Plan. Madison, Wisconsin: Office of the Chancellor, University of Wisconsin, 1988.
Madrid, Arturo. "Quality and Diversity." AAHE Bulletin. June 1988.
McKenna, Barbara, ed. "Minorities in the Education Pipeline: The Unfinished Agenda." Educational Record. Special Issue. Vol. 68, No. 4/Vol. 69, No. 1 (Fall 1987-Winter 1988), pp. 7-16..
Michigan Civil Rights Commission. Civil Rights in Higher Education. Lansing, Michigan: Michigan Department of Civil Rights, 1989.
Minnich, Elizabeth, et al. Reconstructing the Academy: Women's Education and Women's Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Nettles, Michael T., ed. Toward Black Undergraduate Student Equality in American Higher Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.
Nisbet, Robert. Degradation of the Academic Dogma. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1971.
Oliver, Donald W., and Fred M. Newman. "Education and Community, Community and the Schools." Harvard Educational Review, Reprint-Series No. 3. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 1969.
One Year Later . . . Commitment to Leadership: Annual Report on Minority Affairs, 1987-1988. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Office of the President, University of Michigan, 1988.
The Oregon Report, Creating Safety, Valuing Diversity: Lesbians and Gay Men in the University - A Report to the President of the University of Oregon. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon Task Force on Lesbian and Gay Concerns, 1990.
Pearson, Carol S., et al. Educating the Majority: Women Challenge Tradition in Higher Education. New York: MacMillan, 1988.
Pederson, Paul. A Handbook for Developing Multicultural Awareness. Virginia: American Association for Counseling and Development, 1988.
The Research & Training Center on Independent Living. Guidelines for Reporting and Writing about People with Disabilities. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas, 1987.
Retaining and Promoting Women and Minority Faculty Members: Problems and Possibilities. Madison, Wisconsin: Office of Equal Opportunity Programs and Policy Studies: University of Wisconsin, 1990.
Rich, Adrienne. "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Vols. 5-6 (Summer 1980), pp. 631-660.
Sarri, Rosemary, et al. Women in Michigan, A Statistical Portrait. Lansing, Michigan: Michigan Women's Commission, 1987.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. The Disuniting of America. New York: Whittle Books, 1991.
Scott, Joan Wallach. "The Campaign Against Political Correctness, What's Really at Stake." Change. Vol. 23, No. 6 (November/December 1991), pp. 30-43.
Shavlik, Donna S., et al. The New Agenda of Women in Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1988.
Snider Fueri and Associates, "Programming for Diversity." September 1990.
Steele, Shelby. "The Recoloring of Campus Life." Harper's. Vol. 1665 (February 1989), pp. 47-55.
Stein, Terry S. and Carol Cohen, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Psychotherapy with Lesbians and Gay Men. New York: Plenum, 1986.
Sudarkasa, Niara. "Affirmative Action or Affirmation of the Status Quo." AAHE Bulletin. Vol. 68, No. 4 (February 1987), pp. 3-6.
Thomas, R. Roosevelt, Jr. "From Affirmative Action to Affirming Diversity." Harvard Business Review. Vol. 68 (March-April 1990), pp. 107-117.
Thompson, Thomas. The Schooling of Native America. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1978.
Thorne, Barrie et al. Language, Gender and Society. New York: Harper & Row, 1983.
Wilson, Reginald. Race & Equity in Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1982.
___. "Recruitment and Retention of Minority Faculty and Staff." AAHE Bulletin. Vol. 68, No. 4 (February 1987), pp. 11-14.
Wilson, Reginald, and Manuel J. Justiz. "Minorities in Higher Education: Confronting a Time Bomb." Educational Record. Vol. 69, No. 1 (Fall 1987-Winter 1988), pp. 8-14.
___ and Deborah J. Carter. Minorities in Higher Education. Annual Status Reports on Minorities in Higher Education, 1982-1991.Washington D.C.: American Council on Education.